Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
A randomised trial of re-feeding gastric residuals in preterm infants
Ariel A Salas1, Alain Cuna2, Ramachandra Bhat3
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Insights
Re-feeding gastric residual volumes in extremely preterm infants does not shorten the time to full enteral feeding. This practice may be as safe as fresh feeding, but more research is needed to confirm safety outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Clinical Nutrition
Background:
- Enteral nutrition is crucial for preterm infant growth.
- Gastric residual volumes (GRVs) are commonly monitored in preterm infants.
- Current practices for managing large GRVs vary, with some centers re-feeding GRVs and others discarding them.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if re-feeding gastric residual volumes (GRVs) accelerates the achievement of full enteral feeding in extremely preterm infants.
- To assess the safety of re-feeding GRVs compared to using fresh formula or human milk.
Main Methods:
- A parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 1:1 allocation was conducted.
- 72 preterm infants (gestational age 23-28 weeks) receiving minimal enteral nutrition were enrolled.
- Infants were randomized to either re-feed large GRVs or receive fresh feeds.
Main Results:
- The mean time to achieve full enteral feeding (≥120 mL/kg/day) was 10.0 days in the re-feeding group versus 11.3 days in the fresh-feeding group (p=0.11).
- No statistically significant difference in time to full enteral feeding was observed.
- The composite safety endpoint (intestinal perforation, necrotizing enterocolitis, or death) occurred in 17% of the re-feeding group and 28% of the fresh-feeding group (p=0.26).
Conclusions:
- Re-feeding gastric residual volumes does not significantly reduce the time to achieve full enteral feeding in extremely preterm infants.
- The study suggests re-feeding GRVs may be as safe as fresh feeding, but lacks statistical power for definitive safety conclusions.
- Further research with larger sample sizes is warranted to confirm the safety of re-feeding GRVs.
Objective:
To determine whether re-feeding of gastric residual volumes reduces the time needed to achieve full enteral feeding in preterm infants.
Design:
Parallel-group randomised controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Setting:
Regional referral neonatal intensive care unit.
Patients:
72 infants of gestational age 23(0/7) to 28(6/7) weeks receiving minimal enteral nutrition (<24 mL/kg/day) during the first week after birth.
Interventions:
Infants were randomised to either be re-fed with gastric residual volumes (Re-feeding group) or receive fresh formula/human milk (Fresh-feeding group) whenever large gastric residual volumes were noted.
Main Outcome Measure:
The primary efficacy end point was time to achieve full enteral feeding (≥120 mL/kg/day) after randomisation.
Results:
The mean time to full enteral feeding was 10.0 days in the Re-feeding group and 11.3 days in the Fresh-feeding group (mean difference favouring re-feeding: -1.3 days; 95% CI -2.9 to 0.3; p=0.11). The composite safety end point of spontaneous intestinal perforation, surgical necrotising enterocolitis, or death occurred in 6 of 36 infants (17%) in the Re-feeding group versus 10 of 36 infants (28%) in the Fresh-feeding group (p=0.26).
Conclusions:
Re-feeding gastric residual volumes in extremely preterm infants does not reduce time to achieve full enteral feeding. This trial suggests that re-feeding might be as safe as fresh feeding, but further research is needed, due to lack of sufficient statistical power in this study for safety analysis.
Trial Registration Number:
NCT01420263NCT01420263.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Gastric Emptying

