Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Using the Bollen-Stine Bootstrapping Method for Evaluating Approximate Fit Indices
1Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Abstract:
Accepting that a model will not exactly fit any empirical data, global approximate fit indices quantify the degree of misfit. Recent research (Chen et al., 2008) has shown that using fixed conventional cut-points for approximate fit indices can lead to decision errors. Instead of using fixed cut-points for evaluating approximate fit indices, this study focuses on the meaning of approximate fit and introduces a new method to evaluate approximate fit indices. Millsap (2012) introduced a simulation-based method to evaluate approximate fit indices. A limitation of Millsap's work was that a rather strong assumption of multivariate normality was implied in generating simulation data. In this study, the Bollen-Stine bootstrapping procedure (Bollen & Stine, 1993) is proposed to supplement the former study. When data are non-normal, the conclusions derived from Millsap's (2012) simulation method and the Bollen-Stine method can differ. Examples are given to illustrate the use of the Bollen-Stine bootstrapping procedure for evaluating RMSEA. Comparisons are made with the simulation method. The results are discussed, and suggestions are given for the use of proposed method.
Related Concept Videos
Bootstrapping
Goodness-of-Fit Test
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...

