Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Automated Joint Space Detection Improves Bone Segmentation Accuracy
Published on: November 28, 2025
Bony abnormalities of the hip joint: a new comprehensive, reliable and radiation-free measurement method using
Marcie Harris-Hayes1, Paul K Commean2, Jacqueline D Patterson3
1Program in Physical Therapy and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 4444 Forest Park, Campus Box 8502, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States, .
Objectives:
To develop comprehensive and reliable radiation-free methods to quantify femoral and acetabular morphology using MRI.
Methods:
32 hips (16 subjects, 6 with intra-articular hip disorder (IAHD); 10 controls) were included. A 1.5T magnetic resonance system was used to obtain 3D fat suppressed gradient echo images at the pelvis and distal femora. After acquisition, pelvic images were post-processed to correct for coronal, axial and sagittal rotation. Measurements performed included acetabular version (AV), femoral version (FV), lateral center edge angle (LCEA), femoral neck angle (FNA) and alpha angle (AA) at 3, 2, 1 and 12 o'clock. Two experienced raters, a musculoskeletal radiologist and an orthopaedic physical therapist, and a novice rater, a research assistant, completed reliability testing. Raters measured all hips twice with minimum 2 weeks between sessions. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were used to determine rater reliability; standard error of measurements was reported to estimate the reasonable limits of the expected error in the different raters' scores.
Results:
Interrater reliability was good to excellent for all raters for AV, FV, FNA, and LCEA (ICCs: 0.82-0.98); good to excellent between experienced raters (ICCs: 0.78-0.86) and poor to good between novice and experienced raters (ICCs: 0.23-0.78) for AA. Intrarater reliability was good to excellent for all raters for AV, FV and FNA (ICCs: 0.93-0.99); for one experienced and novice rater for LCEA (ICCs: 0.84-0.89); moderate to excellent for the experienced raters for AA (ICCs: 0.72-0.89). Intrarater reliability was poor for the second experienced rater for LCEA (ICC: 0.56), due to a single measurement error and for the novice rater for AA (ICCs: 0.17-0.38).
Conclusion:
We described MRI methods to comprehensively assess femoral and acetabular morphology. Measurements such as AV, FV and FNA and the LCEA can be made reliably by both experienced and novice raters, however the AA measurement was reliable only among experienced raters.
Insights
This study presents reliable, radiation-free MRI methods for quantifying hip morphology, including acetabular version (AV) and femoral version (FV). While AV, FV, femoral neck angle (FNA), and lateral center edge angle (LCEA) are reliably measured by all raters, the alpha angle (AA) requires experienced raters.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedics
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Accurate quantification of femoral and acetabular morphology is crucial for diagnosing and managing hip disorders.
- Current methods may involve radiation exposure, necessitating the development of alternative techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish comprehensive and dependable radiation-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods for assessing femoral and acetabular morphology.
- To evaluate the reliability of these MRI measurements among raters with varying experience levels.
Main Methods:
- 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo MRI scans of the pelvis and distal femora were acquired from 32 hips (16 subjects).
- Key measurements included acetabular version (AV), femoral version (FV), lateral center edge angle (LCEA), femoral neck angle (FNA), and alpha angle (AA).
- Interrater and intrarater reliability were assessed by two experienced raters and one novice rater using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs).
Main Results:
- Interrater reliability was good to excellent for AV, FV, FNA, and LCEA (ICCs: 0.82-0.98) across all raters.
- Interrater reliability for AA was good to excellent between experienced raters (ICCs: 0.78-0.86) but poor to good with novice raters (ICCs: 0.23-0.78).
- Intrarater reliability was good to excellent for AV, FV, and FNA (ICCs: 0.93-0.99) for all raters, but varied for LCEA and AA depending on rater experience.
Conclusions:
- Developed MRI methods provide a comprehensive and reliable approach to quantifying femoral and acetabular morphology without radiation.
- Measurements of AV, FV, FNA, and LCEA demonstrated high reliability for both experienced and novice raters.
- The alpha angle (AA) measurement proved reliable only among experienced raters, indicating a need for specialized training for this specific parameter.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

