Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 19, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Differences in vital signs between elderly and nonelderly patients prior to ward cardiac arrest
Matthew M Churpek1, Trevor C Yuen, Christopher Winslow
11Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 2Department of Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL.
Objectives:
Vital signs and composite scores, such as the Modified Early Warning Score, are used to identify high-risk ward patients and trigger rapid response teams. Although age-related vital sign changes are known to occur, little is known about the differences in vital signs between elderly and nonelderly patients prior to ward cardiac arrest. We aimed to compare the accuracy of vital signs for detecting cardiac arrest between elderly and nonelderly patients.
Design:
Observational cohort study.
Setting:
Five hospitals in the United States.
Patients:
A total of 269,956 patient admissions to the wards with documented age, including 422 index ward cardiac arrests.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements And Main Results:
Patient characteristics and vital signs prior to cardiac arrest were compared between elderly (age, 65 yr or older) and nonelderly (age, <65 yr) patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for vital signs and the Modified Early Warning Score were also compared. Elderly patients had a higher cardiac arrest rate (2.2 vs 1.0 per 1,000 ward admissions; p<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (2.9% vs 0.7%; p<0.001) than nonelderly patients. Within 4 hours of cardiac arrest, elderly patients had significantly lower mean heart rate (88 vs 99 beats/min; p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (60 vs 66 mm Hg; p=0.007), shock index (0.82 vs 0.93; p<0.001), and Modified Early Warning Score (2.6 vs 3.3; p<0.001) and higher pulse pressure index (0.45 vs 0.41; p<0.001) and temperature (36.4°C vs 36.3°C; p=0.047). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for all vital signs and the Modified Early Warning Score were higher for nonelderly patients than elderly patients (Modified Early Warning Score area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.85 [95% CI, 0.82-0.88] vs 0.71 [95% CI, 0.68-0.75]; p<0.001).
Conclusions:
Vital signs more accurately detect cardiac arrest in nonelderly patients compared with elderly patients, which has important implications for how they are used for identifying critically ill patients. More accurate methods for risk stratification of elderly patients are necessary to decrease the occurrence of this devastating event.
More Related Videos
03:13Technical Refinement of a Bilateral Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Mouse Model for Acute Kidney Injury Research
Published on: November 3, 2023
08:19Transthoracic Echocardiography to Assess Post-Resuscitation Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Published on: July 12, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Introduction to Vital Signs
Vital signs help healthcare professionals assess an individual's well-being and detect any functional changes...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Special considerations while measuring pulse
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.