Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

A Method to Test the Efficacy of Handwashing for the Removal of Emerging Infectious Pathogens
Published on: June 7, 2017
Revisiting the washout period in the incident user study design: why 6-12 months may not be sufficient
Andrew W Roberts1, Stacie B Dusetzina, Joel F Farley
1Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, NC, USA.
Aims:
The purpose of this study was to describe how washout period duration affects the size and accuracy of retrospective incident user cohorts.
Materials & Methods:
MarketScan commercial claims data from 2007 to 2010 were used and included adults with an antihyperlipidemic, antidiabetic or antidepressant claim in 2010. Incident user cohorts using 3-, 6-, 12-, 24- and 36-month washouts were created and changes in sample size and incident user misclassification were described.
Results & Conclusion:
The 6- and 12-month washouts excluded 75 and 85% of the samples, respectively. Half of subjects in the 6-month washout cohorts were actually prevalent users, and the 12-month washout period resulted in 30% misclassified. Using common washout periods of 6-12 months may insufficiently address prevalent user bias in large commercial claims databases.
Related Concept Videos
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Censoring Survival Data
Blind Procedures
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...

