Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

Hardy-Weinberg Principle

Diploid organisms have two alleles of each gene, one from each parent, in their somatic cells. Therefore, each individual contributes two alleles to the gene pool of the population. The gene pool of a population is the sum of every allele of all genes within that population and has some degree of variation. Genetic variation is typically expressed as a relative frequency, which is the percentage of the total population that has a given allele, genotype or phenotype.

What is Population Genetics?

What is Population Genetics?

A population is composed of members of the same species that simultaneously live and interact in the same area. When individuals in a population breed, they pass down their genes to their offspring. Many of these genes are polymorphic, meaning that they occur in multiple variants. Such variations of a gene are referred to as alleles. The collective set of all the alleles within a population is known as the gene pool.

Genetics of Speciation

Genetics of Speciation

Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Changing patterns of genetic differentiation in the slender wild oat, <i>Avena barbata</i>.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022

Same author

Comparative linkage mapping of diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid Avena species suggests extensive chromosome rearrangement in ancestral diploids.

Scientific reports·2019

Same author

DIRECT AND INDIRECT ESTIMATES OF SEED VERSUS POLLEN MOVEMENT WITHIN A POPULATION OF PONDEROSA PINE.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017

Same author

HISTORICAL SEPARATION AND PRESENT GENE FLOW THROUGH A ZONE OF SECONDARY CONTACT IN PONDEROSA PINE.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2017

Same author

High-density marker profiling confirms ancestral genomes of Avena species and identifies D-genome chromosomes of hexaploid oat.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2016

Same author

Genome size variation in the genus Avena.

Genome·2016

Same journal

Meeting Report on the Assisted Gene Flow and Climate Change Responses Workshop, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, CA, USA, 5-7 March 2025.

Evolutionary applications·2026

Same journal

Incorporating Population Genomic Perspectives Into Kelp Conservation and Aquaculture in the Pacific Northwest.

Evolutionary applications·2026

Same journal

Multidisciplinary Evaluation of a 10-Year Restoration Program for Two Endangered Atlantic Salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) Populations.

Evolutionary applications·2026

Same journal

Tuberculosis Susceptibility and Inbreeding Depression Hinder <i>Ex Situ</i> Conservation in a Critically Endangered Rainforest Bird.

Evolutionary applications·2026

Same journal

Altitude-Associated Divergence of the Gut Microbiome in Endangered Forest Musk Deer: Evidence From Integrated Metagenomics, Metabolomics, and Culturomics.

Evolutionary applications·2026

Same journal

Evolutionary Footprint: A Systemic Indicator in Evolution, Ecology and Conservation.

Evolutionary applications·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Conservation genetics as applied evolution: from genetic pattern to evolutionary process.

Robert G Latta¹

¹Department of Biology, Dalhousie University Halifax, NS, Canada.

Evolutionary Applications

|January 9, 2015

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Conservation genetics can improve population persistence by focusing on controllable variables and evolutionary outcomes. This approach uses evolutionary theory, experimental evolution, and adaptive management for nuanced conservation policies.

Keywords:

adaptation adaptive management effective population size experimental evolution genetic inference population structure theoretical modelling

More Related Videos

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Procedure for Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Microorganisms Using a Chemostat

Published on: September 20, 2016

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Conservation science
Population genetics

Background:

Conservation genetics often infers population parameters from genetic variation in threatened populations.
Current methods yield limited resolution, leading to conservative conservation policy recommendations.
A more proactive approach is needed to enhance population persistence.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a shift in conservation genetics towards a probabilistic approach.
To link controllable variables with desirable evolutionary outcomes for conservation.
To enhance the confidence and nuance in conservation policy recommendations.

Main Methods:

Increased application of existing evolutionary theory.
Testing management strategies through experimental evolution.
Implementing 'field trials' within an adaptive management framework.

Main Results:

A probabilistic framework acknowledging evolutionary stochasticity.
Potential for more nuanced conservation policies beyond simple guidelines.
Leveraging established evolutionary knowledge for practical conservation.

Conclusions:

Shifting focus to controllable variables and evolutionary outcomes offers a more effective conservation genetics strategy.
Integrating evolutionary theory and experimental approaches can yield more robust conservation policies.
This probabilistic, adaptive management framework enhances confidence in conservation efforts for threatened populations.