Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

66.5K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
66.5K
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

7.2K
Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
7.2K
Mismatch Repair01:36

Mismatch Repair

46.0K
Overview
46.0K
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

45.6K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
45.6K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

36.2K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
36.2K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

23.6K
Overview
23.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A global research coordination programme is urgently needed for biodiversity.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026
Same author

Avian predation has the strongest impact on vole survival during winter and spring in temperate grasslands.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Global assessment of landscape pattern changes from 1992 to 2020.

Landscape ecology·2025
Same author

Predicting the way forward for the Global Biodiversity Framework.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Future Projections of Biodiversity Under Global Change Need to Include Genetic Diversity.

Global change biology·2025
Same author

Pollination ecology in the tropical Andes: moving towards a cross-scale approach.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.4K

Mutation accumulation and the formation of range limits.

Roslyn C Henry1, Kamil A Bartoń2, Justin M J Travis2

  • 1Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Zoology Building, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, UK r01rch12@abdn.ac.uk.

Biology Letters
|January 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Mutation accumulation significantly shrinks species ranges, particularly with limited dispersal and low growth rates. This highlights the critical role of deleterious mutations in shaping species distributions.

Keywords:
dispersalenvironmental gradientsmutation loadrange formation

More Related Videos

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

25.6K
Methods to Increase the Sensitivity of High Resolution Melting Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping in Malaria
10:27

Methods to Increase the Sensitivity of High Resolution Melting Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping in Malaria

Published on: November 10, 2015

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

1.4K
Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay
07:44

Measuring Microbial Mutation Rates with the Fluctuation Assay

Published on: November 28, 2019

25.6K
Methods to Increase the Sensitivity of High Resolution Melting Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping in Malaria
10:27

Methods to Increase the Sensitivity of High Resolution Melting Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Genotyping in Malaria

Published on: November 10, 2015

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Ecological genetics

Background:

  • Species distribution and range dynamics are crucial for ecological and evolutionary understanding.
  • The impact of mutation accumulation on range formation has been largely overlooked.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of mutation accumulation on the spatial extent of species ranges.
  • To identify factors modulating the effect of mutation load on range dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical modeling of population dynamics across environmental gradients.
  • Simulation of mutation accumulation under varying dispersal rates, growth rates, and mutation effects.

Main Results:

  • Mutation accumulation was found to severely reduce the extent of species ranges.
  • This reduction was most pronounced under conditions of limited dispersal, low growth rates, and intermediate deleterious mutation effects.
  • Dispersal showed a dual role, potentially reducing mutation load but increasing migration load in marginal populations.

Conclusions:

  • Deleterious mutations play a significant role in limiting species range formation.
  • Future research should focus on mutation load dynamics in range formation, considering the complex effects of dispersal.