Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026
Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Trainees can learn minimally invasive aortic valve replacement without compromising safety
Gopal Soppa1, Martin Yates1, Alessandro Viviano1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anaesthesia, St George's Hospital, London, UK.
Objectives:
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (Mini-AVR) is a technically advanced procedure. However, it results in equivalent operative mortality, less bleeding and reduced intensive care/hospital stay when compared with conventional AVR. Our aim was to assess the impact of trainee performance on short-term outcomes of patients undergoing elective and urgent Mini-AVR where a significant proportion were performed by trainees.
Methods:
All patients undergoing non-emergency, elective and urgent, isolated Mini-AVR between September 2005 and December 2012 were studied. Operative details and short-term outcomes, with particular attention to trainee performance, were analysed.
Results:
During the study period, there were 205 Mini-AVR with a median age of 67 years (range 29-86); 74 (36%) operations were performed by trainees. The overall median cross-clamp and bypass times were 42 (range 33-63) and 59 min (range 59-94) for the attending surgeon and 52 (range 42-63) and 71 min (range 59-94) for the trainee (P = 0.03). Five Mini-AVR patients (2.4%) required conversion to full sternotomy for ascending aortic replacement, right ventricular bleeding, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and failure to cardiovert. None of these cases were performed by trainees. Median lengths of intensive care and hospital stay were 1 and 5 days and were not different for attending surgeon and trainee. Only 1 (0.5%) patient died in hospital.
Conclusions:
Mini-AVR can be performed with a low conversion rate and hospital stay and taught to trainees without compromising safety.
