Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cranial Bones: Lateral View01:27

Cranial Bones: Lateral View

8.3K
The lateral view of the cranium is dominated by temporal, sphenoid, and ethmoid bones.
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...
8.3K
Sutures of the Skull01:22

Sutures of the Skull

14.8K
The human skull is composed of several bones that come together to protect the brain and support the structures of the face. The junctions where these bones meet are called sutures.
Sutures are immobile joints between adjacent bones of the skull. The narrow gap between the bones is filled with dense, fibrous connective tissue that unites the bones. The long sutures located between the skull bones are not straight but instead follow irregular, tightly twisting paths. These twisting lines tightly...
14.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Two-Piece Fixation Device for Reliable Nasotracheal Intubation in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026
Same author

Advancing the Science, Timing, and Long-Term Impact of Cleft and Craniofacial Care.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Spring-mediated cranioplasty for scaphocephaly: techniques and outcomes.

Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Microsurgical Resection of an Inclusion Cyst in a Fetal Myeloschisis Patient: A Surgical Anatomy and Technical Note.

Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)·2026
Same author

Fillet Flaps for Lower Extremity Salvage.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same author

Economic Valuation and Disability Averted After Cleft Lip and/or Palate Repair in Botswana From 2018 to 2022.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

430

Cranial base deviation in hemifacial microsomia by craniometric analysis.

James Thomas Paliga1, Youssef Tahiri, Jason Wink

  • 1From the Division of Plastic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
|January 9, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study found that the cranial base angle and endocranial morphology do not significantly differ in patients with hemifacial microsomia (HFM) compared to controls. These findings suggest the cranial base is not a primary factor in HFM development across varying severities.

More Related Videos

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

963
Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

430
Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

963
Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans
10:23

Author Spotlight: Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmark Annotation Demonstration on Human Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Published on: September 8, 2023

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Craniofacial anatomy
  • Developmental biology
  • Medical imaging analysis

Background:

  • Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is a congenital condition characterized by facial asymmetry, primarily affecting the mandible and maxilla.
  • While facial structures are well-studied in HFM, the endocranial morphology, particularly the cranial base, remains underexplored.
  • Understanding cranial base involvement is crucial for elucidating HFM pathogenesis and guiding treatment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the endocranial morphology, including skull base angulation and transverse craniometric measures, in patients with unilateral hemifacial microsomia (HFM).
  • To compare these measurements between different HFM severity groups (mild, moderate, severe) and age-matched controls.
  • To investigate potential correlations between cranial base morphology and HFM severity.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 30 patients with unilateral HFM treated between 2000 and 2012.
  • Classification of HFM severity using the Kaban-Pruzansky system.
  • Measurement of skull base angulation and transverse craniometric distances using standardized landmarks, compared with age-matched controls.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference was observed in the mean cranial base angle between HFM patients and controls (179.6° vs. 180.0°, P = 0.51).
  • Cranial base angulation showed no significant variation across different HFM severity groups (P = 0.57).
  • Transverse craniometric measurements and distances from the midline to specific foramina (hypoglossal, carotid, ovale, rotundum, internal acoustic meatus) did not differ significantly between affected and unaffected sides or across severity groups.

Conclusions:

  • The cranial base axis is not significantly deviated in patients with hemifacial microsomia (HFM) compared to age-matched controls.
  • Endocranial morphologic measurements show minimal variation with increasing HFM severity.
  • These findings suggest that the cranial base may not be a primary determinant in the pathogenesis of HFM, despite its known role in facial growth.