Cost-effectiveness of revascularization strategies: the ASCERT study
Zugui Zhang1, Paul Kolm1, Maria V Grau-Sepulveda2
1Value Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware.
Insights
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) offers better long-term outcomes than percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease, despite higher initial costs. CABG provides improved life-years gained, making it a valuable consideration for patient care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- The ASCERT study compared long-term effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Focus on patients aged 65+ with 2- or 3-vessel coronary artery disease.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CABG versus PCI in patients with stable ischemic heart disease.
- To compare long-term outcomes and healthcare expenditures associated with each revascularization strategy.
Main Methods:
- Linked STS/ACC-F databases with CMS claims data for cost assessment.
- Utilized propensity score matching to adjust for baseline differences between CABG and PCI groups.
- Measured effectiveness through mortality and life-expectancy data, calculating cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.
Main Results:
- CABG patients (n=86,244) incurred higher adjusted costs: $10,670 (index hospitalization), $8,145 (study period), and $11,575 (lifetime).
- CABG patients gained an average of 0.2525 life-years (observation period) and 0.3801 life-years (lifetime) compared to PCI patients (n=103,549).
- The lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for CABG versus PCI was $30,454 per QALY gained.
Conclusions:
- Over 4+ years, CABG demonstrates superior patient outcomes compared to PCI for coronary artery disease.
- The improved effectiveness of CABG is associated with increased healthcare costs.
- The findings provide crucial data for decision-making regarding revascularization strategies in older adults with complex CAD.
Background:
ASCERT (American College of Cardiology Foundation and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Collaboration on the Comparative Effectiveness of Revascularization Strategies) was a large observational study designed to compare the long-term effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to treat coronary artery disease (CAD) over 4 to 5 years.
Objectives:
This study examined the cost-effectiveness of CABG versus PCI for stable ischemic heart disease.
Methods:
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and American College of Cardiology Foundation databases were linked to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims data. Costs for the index and observation period (2004 to 2008) hospitalizations were assessed by diagnosis-related group Medicare reimbursement rates; costs beyond the observation period were estimated from average Medicare participant per capita expenditure. Effectiveness was measured via mortality and life-expectancy data. Cost and effectiveness comparisons were adjusted using propensity score matching with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained.
Results:
CABG patients (n = 86,244) and PCI patients (n = 103,549) were at least 65 years old with 2- or 3-vessel coronary artery disease. Adjusted costs were higher for CABG for the index hospitalization, study period, and lifetime by $10,670, $8,145, and $11,575, respectively. Patients undergoing CABG gained an adjusted average of 0.2525 and 0.3801 life-years relative to PCI over the observation period and lifetime, respectively. The life-time incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CABG compared to PCI was $30,454/QALY gained.
Conclusions:
Over a period of 4 years or longer, patients undergoing CABG had better outcomes but at higher costs than those undergoing PCI.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care


