Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Induction and Validation of Cellular Senescence in Primary Human Cells
Published on: June 20, 2018
Modelling the onset of senescence at the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint
Background:
DNA damage (single or double-strand breaks) triggers adapted cellular responses. These responses are elicited through signalling pathways, which activate cell cycle checkpoints and basically lead to three cellular fates: cycle arrest promoting DNA repair, senescence (permanent arrest) or cell death. Cellular senescence is known for having a tumour-suppressive function and its regulation arouses a growing scientific interest. Here, we advance a qualitative model covering DNA damage response pathways, focusing on G1/S checkpoint enforcement, supposedly more sensitive to arrest than G2/M checkpoint.
Results:
We define a discrete, logical model encompassing ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) pathways activation upon DNA damage, as well as G1/S checkpoint main components. It also includes the stress responsive protein p38MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase 14) known to be involved in the regulation of senescence. The model has four outcomes that convey alternative cell fates: proliferation, (transient) cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and senescence. Different levels of DNA damage are considered, defined by distinct combinations of single and double-strand breaks. Each leads to a single stable state denoting the cell fate adopted upon this specific damage. A range of model perturbations corresponding to gene loss-of-function or gain-of-function is compared to experimental mutations.
Conclusions:
As a step towards an integrative model of DNA-damage response pathways to better cover the onset of senescence, our model focuses on G1/S checkpoint enforcement. This model qualitatively agrees with most experimental observations, including experiments involving mutations. Furthermore, it provides some predictions.
Insights
This study models DNA damage responses, focusing on the G1/S checkpoint to predict cell fates like arrest, senescence, or death. The model aligns with experimental data and offers new insights into DNA repair and senescence regulation.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular Biology
- Systems Biology
Background:
- DNA damage triggers cellular responses, including cell cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis.
- Cellular senescence plays a tumor-suppressive role, making its regulation a key research area.
- This study focuses on the G1/S checkpoint's role in DNA damage response, hypothesizing its higher sensitivity to arrest compared to G2/M.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a qualitative model of DNA damage response pathways.
- To specifically investigate the G1/S checkpoint's role in determining cell fate.
- To explore the regulation of cellular senescence following DNA damage.
Main Methods:
- A discrete, logical model was created incorporating ATM and ATR pathways, G1/S checkpoint components, and p38MAPK.
- The model simulates responses to various levels of DNA damage (single and double-strand breaks).
- Model perturbations simulated gene loss-of-function and gain-of-function mutations for comparison with experimental data.
Main Results:
- The model predicts four distinct cell fates: proliferation, transient cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence.
- Each specific DNA damage level corresponds to a unique, stable cell fate outcome.
- Model predictions showed qualitative agreement with experimental observations, including mutation experiments.
Conclusions:
- The developed model serves as a step towards an integrated understanding of DNA damage response pathways and senescence.
- The model accurately reflects experimental findings and provides testable predictions.
- Further research can build upon this model to comprehensively study DNA damage response and senescence.
Related Concept Videos
The Cell Cycle Control System
Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) are the primary cell cycle regulators and...
The Cell Cycle Control System
The Cell Cycle Control System
Cells Coordinate Growth and Proliferation
Negative Regulator Molecules
Inhibition of Cdk Activity

