Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Two-year clinical outcome from the Iberian registry patients after left atrial appendage closure
José Ramón López Mínguez1, Juan Manuel Nogales Asensio1, Javier Elduayen Gragera1
1Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina, Badajoz, Spain.
Insights
Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure with an occlusion device in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients showed fewer thromboembolic and bleeding events than predicted. This procedure is a viable option for patients unable to take oral anticoagulants.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) increases stroke risk.
- Oral anticoagulants are standard but contraindicated in some NVAF patients.
- Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure offers an alternative stroke prevention strategy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the incidence of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events after LAA occlusion in NVAF patients.
- To compare observed events with predicted risks from CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores.
- To assess the safety and efficacy of LAA closure in patients with contraindications for oral anticoagulants.
Main Methods:
- 167 NVAF patients contraindicated for oral anticoagulants underwent LAA closure with an occlusion device.
- Follow-up included at least two transoesophageal echocardiograms within 6 months.
- Patients received aspirin and clopidogrel, and were monitored for clinical events and mortality over 24 months.
Main Results:
- Successful LAA implantation in 94.6% of patients; 5.38% experienced intraoperative complications.
- Over 24 months, 10.8% mortality (mostly non-cardiac), 10.1% bleeding (5.7% major), and 4.4% stroke incidence.
- Major bleeding and stroke/TIA events were significantly lower than predicted by CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, and HAS-BLED scores (p<0.001 to p=0.047).
Conclusions:
- LAA closure with an occlusion device is a safe and effective alternative for NVAF patients contraindicated for oral anticoagulants.
- The procedure is associated with a lower-than-expected rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events.
- This therapeutic option demonstrates particular benefit in reducing events during the second year post-implantation.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to observe the percentage of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events over a 2-year follow-up in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) with an occlusion device. Observed events and CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke history), CHA2DS2-VASc (also adding: vascular disease and sex) and HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal liver/renal function, stroke history, bleeding predisposition, labile international normalised ratios, elderly, drugs/alcohol use)-predicted events were compared.
Methods:
LAA closure with an occlusion device was performed in 167 NVAF patients contraindicated for oral anticoagulants and recruited from 12 hospitals between 2009 and 2013. At least two transoesophageal echocardiograms were performed in the first 6 months postimplantation. Antithrombotics included clopidogrel and aspirin. Patients were monitored for death, stroke, major and relevant bleeding and hospitalisation for concomitant conditions. Mean age was 74.68±8.58, median follow-up was 24 months, 5.38% had intraoperative complications and implantation was successful in 94.6% of subjects. Mortality during follow-up was 10.8%, mostly (9.5%) non-cardiac related. Bleeding occurred in 10.1% of subjects, 5.7% major and 4.4% minor though relevant, and 4.4% suffered stroke. Major bleeding and stroke/transient ischaemic attack events within 2 years (annual event rates, 290 patients/year) were less frequent than expected from CHADS2 (2.4% vs 9.6%), CHA2DS2-VASc (2.4% vs 8.3%) and HAS-BLED (3.1% vs 6.6%) risk scores (p<0.001, p=0.003, p=0.047, respectively).
Conclusions:
LAA closure with an occlusion device in patients contraindicated for oral anticoagulants is a therapeutic option associated with fewer thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events than expected from risk scores, particularly in the second year postimplantation.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations

