A comparative study on use of 3% saline versus 0.9% saline nebulization in children with bronchiolitis

A R Ojha1, S Mathema1, S Sah1

  • 1Pediatric Department, Kathmandu Medical College, Kathmandu.

Insights

Hypertonic saline nebulization offers no clinical advantage over normal saline for managing bronchiolitis in infants. This study found no significant difference in hospital stay, oxygen use, or recovery time between the two treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Respiratory Medicine
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Bronchiolitis is a common respiratory illness in young children.
  • It involves airway inflammation, mucus production, and obstruction.
  • Understanding treatment effects is crucial for pediatric care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical profile of bronchiolitis in children under two.
  • To assess the efficacy of 3% hypertonic saline nebulization compared to normal saline.

Main Methods:

  • A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted.
  • Patients received either 3% hypertonic saline or 0.9% normal saline via nebulization.
  • Clinical scores were monitored before each treatment session.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference was observed in the mean duration of hospital stay between the 3% and 0.9% saline groups (p=0.86).
  • Similarly, durations of oxygen supplementation (p=0.85) and time to clinical score normalization (p=0.80) were comparable.
  • Bronchiolitis represented 11.26% of total admissions, with a majority of patients under 12 months old.

Conclusions:

  • Hypertonic saline nebulization showed no significant benefit over normal saline in managing pediatric bronchiolitis.
  • Current evidence does not support the routine use of hypertonic saline for this condition.
Abstract