Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Murine Distal Colostomy, A Novel Model of Diversion Colitis in C57BL/6 Mice
Published on: July 12, 2018
National trends of 3- versus 2-stage restorative proctocolectomy for chronic ulcerative colitis
Jai Bikhchandani1, Stephanie F Polites, Amy E Wagie
11Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 2Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 3Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Background:
Patients undergoing surgical treatment of chronic ulcerative colitis usually undergo a staged approach to IPAA.
Objective:
The purpose of this work was to identify the national trends in approach to IPAA for chronic ulcerative colitis and to evaluate 30-day outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
Design:
This was a retrospective review study
Settings:
: This study was conducted at a tertiary care cancer center.
Patients:
Patients with chronic ulcerative colitis who underwent IPAA from 2005 to 2011 were identified. Those who underwent colectomy with pouch procedure were placed in a 2-stage cohort, and those without simultaneous colectomy were part of a 3-stage cohort. Emergent operations were excluded.
Main Outcome Measures:
Trends in procedure mix, preoperative characteristics, and postoperative 30-day outcomes were compared. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for postoperative infection.
Results:
Of 2002 patients who underwent IPAA, 1452 (72.5%) underwent 2-stage and 550 (27.5%) underwent 3-stage surgery. Since 2007, the distribution of 2- versus 3-stage procedures has not changed (p = 0.66). At the time of pouch surgery, patients who had undergone 3-stage surgery were less likely to have preoperative corticosteroid therapy, albumin <3 mg/dL, preoperative sepsis, and weight loss (all p < 0.05). Superficial surgical site infection was more common after 3-stage surgery (11.5% vs 7.3%; p < 0.01). After controlling for preoperative factors, wound classification was the only independent predictor of deep incisional or organ space infection (p < 0.01; OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.23-2.53).
Limitations:
This was a retrospective study.
Conclusions:
National trends of 2- versus 3-stage IPAA have remained stable over the last 5 years. Patients who underwent a 3-stage approach were healthier at the time of pouch surgery, with decreased corticosteroid use, hypoalbuminemia, and weight loss. Mixed results were seen for infectious complications with either approach. Prospective research is needed to determine the best approach to IPAA for chronic ulcerative colitis.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
03:43Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease II: Ulcerative Colitis