Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.9K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.9K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.3K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.3K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.5K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

32.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.6K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

14.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
14.3K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

48.5K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
48.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors Affecting Student Experiences on Work-Integrated Placements-A Scoping Review of Trans-Tasman Studies.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2026
Same author

Occupational radiation exposure in nuclear medicine technologists: A scoping review.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences·2025
Same author

Emotional intelligence evaluation tools used in allied health students: A scoping review.

Journal of medical radiation sciences·2024
Same author

Occupational burnout in nuclear medicine technologists working in Australia and New Zealand - results of a multi-national survey.

Journal of medical radiation sciences·2024
Same author

Cone beam computed tomography image guidance within a magnetic resonance imaging-only planning workflow.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2023
Same author

Systemic disregard, demoralising occupational burnout, protective maturity: The 'lived' experience of nuclear medicine technologists and the impact of COVID-19.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.8K

Research methods for formal consensus development.

Daphne James1, Helen Warren-Forward

  • 1University of Newcastle School of Health Sciences, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

Nurse Researcher
|January 15, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This review compares three formal research methods for developing consensus statements: Delphi technique, nominal group technique, and consensus development conferences. Selecting an appropriate method ensures rigor and credibility in clinical practice guidelines.

Keywords:
DelphiResearch designconsensusconsensus development conferencenominal group techniqueresearch methods

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.4K
A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
08:42

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

Published on: July 31, 2017

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.8K
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.4K
A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
08:42

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research

Published on: July 31, 2017

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Health research methodology
  • Evidence-based practice

Background:

  • Consensus statements and guidelines are crucial for standardizing practice and informing health policy, especially when evidence is limited.
  • Clinicians must critically evaluate the quality of practice guidelines for incorporation into clinical decisions.
  • Formal consensus development methods offer a scientific approach using expert panels to synthesize evidence and opinions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare three formal research methods for developing consensus.
  • To provide guidance for researchers in selecting an appropriate method for creating consensus statements and guidelines.
  • To highlight the importance of formal methods for ensuring the rigor and credibility of clinical practice guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • A literature review was conducted using online searches of Medline and CINAHL databases.
  • The review focused on peer-reviewed English-language articles on consensus, consensus development, and research methods.

Main Results:

  • The Delphi technique, nominal group technique, and consensus development conference are presented as key methods.
  • Advantages of each technique are described with supporting literature examples.
  • A flowchart is provided to aid researchers in selecting the most suitable consensus development method.

Conclusions:

  • Formal research methods are essential for developing credible and rigorous consensus guidelines in clinical practice.
  • The paper assists researchers in choosing the optimal method for their specific needs in consensus development.
  • Online resources for developing and evaluating clinical guidelines are also reviewed.