Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
R Wave in aVL Lead is a Robust Index of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: A Cardiac MRI Study
Pierre-Yves Courand1, Adrien Grandjean2, Paul Charles2
1Cardiology Department, European Society of Hypertension Excellence center, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Génomique Fonctionnelle de l'Hypertension artérielle, Villeurbanne, France; Hôpital Nord-Ouest, Villefranche-sur-Saône, France;
Insights
The R wave in lead aVL (RaVL) effectively identifies left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) across various cardiac conditions. A RaVL of 1.0 mV or higher strongly indicates LVH, simplifying diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Electrocardiography
Background:
- The R wave in lead aVL (RaVL) correlates with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in healthy individuals.
- Previous studies focused on patients without known cardiac disease.
- The utility of ECG criteria for LVH in complex cardiac conditions requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with cardiac MRI (CMR) findings.
- To evaluate RaVL and other ECG parameters in patients with cardiomyopathy or conduction disorders.
- To establish reliable ECG-based indicators for LVH in diverse patient populations.
Main Methods:
- Cardiac MRI (CMR) and ECG were performed on 501 patients within 5 days.
- CMR-defined LVH cut-offs were established: 83 g/m² for men and 67 g/m² for women.
- Statistical analysis assessed correlations between ECG parameters and CMR-derived LVMI.
Main Results:
- RaVL independently correlated with LVMI in patients with and without myocardial infarction (MI).
- SV3 correlated with LVMI and LV enlargement only in patients without MI.
- An optimal RaVL cut-off of 1.1 mV showed 98.3% specificity and 19.6% sensitivity for LVH; a threshold of 1.0 mV is proposed for definitive LVH diagnosis.
Conclusions:
- RaVL is a reliable indicator of LVH across various clinical settings, with a univocal threshold of 1.0 mV.
- An algorithm using RaVL (below 0.5 mV to exclude, above 1.0 mV to establish LVH) and composite indices (0.5-1.0 mV) achieved 85% accurate classification.
- SV3 can augment RaVL's performance, particularly in cases of LV enlargement.
Background:
In patients free from overt cardiac disease, R wave in aVL lead (RaVL) is strongly correlated with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) assessed by transthoracic echocardiography. The aim of the present study was to extend this finding to other settings (cardiomyopathy or conduction disorders), by comparing ECG criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) to cardiac MRI (CMR).
Methods:
In 501 patients, CMR and ECG were performed within a median-period of 5 days. CMR LVH cut-offs used were 83 g/m2 in men and 67 g/m2 in women.
Results:
RaVL was independently correlated with LVMI in patients with or without myocardial infarction (MI) (N = 300 and N = 201, respectively). SV3 was independently correlated with LVMI and LV enlargement only in patients without MI. In the whole cohort, RaVL had area under receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.729 (specificity 98.3%, sensitivity 19.6%, optimal cut-off 1.1 mV). The performance of RaVL was remarkable in women, in Caucasians, and in the presence of right bundle branch block. It decreased in case of MI. Overall, it is proposed that below 0.5 mV and above 1.0 mV, RaVL is sufficient to exclude or establish LVH. Between 0.5 and 1 mV, composite indices (Cornell voltage or product) should be used. Using this algorithm allowed classifying appropriately 85% of the patients.
Conclusions:
Our results showed that RaVL is a good index of LVH with a univocal threshold of 1.0 mV in various clinical conditions. SV3 may be combined to RaVL in some conditions, namely LV enlargement to increase its performance.
More Related Videos
07:11Morphological and Functional Assessment of the Right Ventricle Using 3D Echocardiography
Published on: October 28, 2020
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests