Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is there a difference in the spread of excitation at different electrode locations along the cochlea?

CoDAS·2025
Same author

Effect of Topical Intra-Auricular Lidocaine on Tinnitus: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

International archives of otorhinolaryngology·2025
Same author

Analysis of Auditory Function before and after a Single Session of Hemodialysis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

International archives of otorhinolaryngology·2025
Same author

Feasibility of Self-Programming of the Speech Processor Via Remote Assistant Fitting in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.

International archives of otorhinolaryngology·2025
Same author

Disparities among Different Countries in Access for Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2024
Same author

The international expert consensus on management of external auditory canal carcinoma.

European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery·2024
Same journal

Voice disorder is recognized as an occupational disease.

CoDAS·2026
Same journal

Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and manual laryngeal therapy on muscle tension dysphonia: randomized clinical trial.

CoDAS·2026
Same journal

Validation and standardization of the Scale of Self-Perception of Central Auditory Processing Skills (EAPAC) - expanded.

CoDAS·2026
Same journal

Habitual lip and tongue posture in infants with Trisomy 21: characterization and associated factors.

CoDAS·2026
Same journal

Behavioral and functional aspects among public and private middle school students.

CoDAS·2026
Same journal

Assessing pragmatic abilities of small children with and without ASD diagnosis.

CoDAS·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

4.3K

Remote programming of cochlear implants.

Paola Angelica Samuel1, Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez1, Aline Gomes Bittencourt2

  • 1Cochlear Implant Group, Hospital das Clínicas, School of Medicine, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Codas
|January 16, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Remote programming (RP) of cochlear implants is effective, matching live programming (LP) results for speech perception and audiometry. Minor differences in stimulation levels did not impact patient outcomes.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.1K
Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

4.3K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.1K
Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation
09:10

Performing Intracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation

Published on: March 8, 2022

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Otolaryngology

Background:

  • Cochlear implants (CIs) are vital for hearing restoration.
  • Programming CIs traditionally requires in-person visits.
  • Remote programming (RP) offers a potential alternative for CI management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the efficacy of remote programming (RP) versus live programming (LP) for cochlear implants.
  • To compare stimulation levels and audiological outcomes between RP and LP.
  • To evaluate the impact of RP on speech perception and audiometry.

Main Methods:

  • Twelve adult cochlear implant users (18-59 years) with at least 12 months of device use participated.
  • Both RP and live programming (LP) were conducted on the same day.
  • Minimum (T) and maximum (C) stimulation levels were measured, alongside speech perception tests and free-field audiometry.

Main Results:

  • Slight variations were observed in mean stimulation levels (T and C) for specific electrodes between RP and LP.
  • No statistically significant differences were found in speech perception test results.
  • Audiometric thresholds remained consistent across both programming methods.

Conclusions:

  • Remote programming (RP) is a viable and effective method for managing cochlear implant devices.
  • Despite minor electrode-specific stimulation level differences, RP does not compromise speech understanding.
  • RP simplifies CI management without negatively affecting patient hearing outcomes.