Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 20, 2018
Barriers to clinical trial recruitment in head and neck cancer
Robert I Haddad1, Anthony T C Chan2, Jan B Vermorken3
1Head and Neck Oncology Program/Harvard Medical School, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Abstract:
Despite substantial improvements in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) over the last two decades, overall survival rates remain unsatisfactory. The need for improved therapeutic approaches for HNC patients is hampered by low patient recruitment rates in HNC clinical trials, particularly Phase III studies. Based on an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov, this article identified several potential barriers to patient recruitment in Phase I-III clinical trials of treatments for HNC. Of 694 HNC trials identified on ClinicalTrials.gov from multiple sites worldwide, 91 (13.1%) were identified as either terminated, suspended or withdrawn; 27.5% (n=25) of these did not provide an additional reason for stopping recruitment early. Insufficient accrual was the most common reason provided for trial closure (n=23, 25.3%). Possible reasons for the insufficient accrual rates include the inappropriate designs of these studies given the change in HNC tumour biology in the last 20years, the low incidence of the disease, and the diversity of treatment standards and referral processes across countries. Given the low numbers of drugs approved for HNC, it is important that barriers to recruitment in this field are addressed to allow new therapies to be successfully validated in completed clinical trials. This review discusses how these accrual challenges may be overcome with changes to clinical trial designs, including their adaptation to specific subgroups, such as human papillomavirus-positive patients.
Insights
Low patient recruitment hinders head and neck cancer (HNC) clinical trials. Addressing barriers in trial design and subgroup adaptation is crucial for validating new HNC therapies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Head and Neck Cancer Research
Background:
- Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatments have improved, but survival rates remain low.
- Low patient recruitment in HNC clinical trials, especially Phase III, impedes progress.
- Developing novel therapeutic approaches for HNC is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- Identify barriers to patient recruitment in head and neck cancer clinical trials (Phase I-III).
- Analyze reasons for trial closure due to insufficient patient accrual.
- Propose strategies to overcome recruitment challenges and improve trial success rates.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 694 head and neck cancer trials from ClinicalTrials.gov.
- Identification of trials terminated, suspended, or withdrawn.
- Examination of reasons cited for early trial closure, focusing on insufficient accrual.
Main Results:
- 13.1% of identified HNC trials were terminated, suspended, or withdrawn.
- Insufficient accrual was the most common reason for trial closure (25.3%).
- Potential reasons include outdated study designs, low disease incidence, and diverse international standards.
Conclusions:
- Barriers to patient recruitment significantly impact the validation of new HNC therapies.
- Revising clinical trial designs, including subgroup adaptation (e.g., HPV-positive patients), may enhance accrual.
- Addressing recruitment challenges is vital for advancing head and neck cancer treatment.
More Related Videos
07:29Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
07:44Translationally-Relevant Tumor Resection Model for Murine Preclinical Models of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: April 3, 2026
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Longitudinal Research