Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Update on Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) coding 2026 for general and visceral surgery : From the Department for Health Economics Section of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV)].

Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

EHS Guidelines on the Management of Primary Ventral and Incisional Hernias Under Emergency Conditions.

Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS·2026
Same author

Long-Term Outcomes After Slowly Resorbable P4HB Mesh Implantation: A Multicenter Analysis From European Registry.

World journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Ultrasound-Guided Botulinum Toxin A as an Adjunct to Intraoperative Fascial Traction in Incisional Hernia Repair: Registry-Based Cohort Study.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Long-term outcomes of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: registry-based propensity score-matched analysis.

BJS open·2025
Same author

Short- and long-term complications after slowly resorbable biosynthetic P4HB mesh (Phasix) implantation in European centres: a protocol paper for a multiregistry study.

BMJ open·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
07:22

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K

Robotic vs. Standard Laparoscopic Technique - What is Better?

Ferdinand Köckerling1

  • 1Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vivantes Hospital Berlin, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School , Berlin , Germany.

Frontiers in Surgery
|January 17, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Robotic surgery offers comparable safety to laparoscopic surgery for complex visceral procedures, with potential benefits like reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stays. Further research is needed to fully establish its role in visceral surgery.

Keywords:
laparoscopic surgerymeta-analysisoncological surgeryrobotic surgerysystematic review

More Related Videos

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

6.5K
Robotic-assisted Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis
11:07

Robotic-assisted Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis

Published on: September 5, 2025

1.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
07:22

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.3K
Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
11:03

Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst

Published on: June 24, 2022

6.5K
Robotic-assisted Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis
11:07

Robotic-assisted Lateral Pancreaticojejunostomy for Chronic Pancreatitis

Published on: September 5, 2025

1.2K

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Robotics
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery has limitations in complex procedures.
  • Robotic surgery was developed to overcome these limitations.
  • The efficacy of robotic surgery versus standard laparoscopy requires evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare robotic surgery with standard laparoscopic surgery for abdominal and visceral procedures.
  • To determine if robotic techniques offer patient advantages.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of comparative studies.
  • Examination of robotic vs. laparoscopic techniques in abdominal and visceral surgery.

Main Results:

  • Robotic surgery shows a similar perioperative complication rate to open and laparoscopic procedures.
  • Oncological outcomes for robotic resection in gastric, pancreatic, and rectal cancer are adequate.
  • Robotic surgery may lead to less blood loss, lower conversion rates, and shorter hospital stays, despite longer operating times.

Conclusions:

  • High-quality prospective randomized trials are necessary.
  • Further evaluation is needed to define the future role of robotic techniques in visceral surgery.