Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

An Immunohistopathologic Study to Profile the Folate Receptor Beta Macrophage and Vascular Immune Microenvironment in Giant Cell Arteritis
Published on: February 8, 2019
The long-term outcomes of systemic vasculitis
Kerstin Westman1, Oliver Flossmann2, Gina Gregorini3
1Department of Nephrology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skane University Hospital Malmö, Lund, Sweden.
Long-term outcomes for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) patients are crucial. This review examines relapse rates, survival, and adverse events in AAV patients from EUVAS trials, focusing on improving long-term patient care.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology and Immunology
- Clinical Trials and Outcomes Research
Background:
- Generalized ANCA-associated small vessel vasculitis (AAV) historically has a poor prognosis without timely diagnosis and treatment.
- Immunosuppressive therapy has improved survival but carries significant side effects and a high relapse rate (nearly 50%).
- Previous outcome reports for AAV patients are often heterogeneous in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term effects and adverse events of original randomized trials conducted by the European Vasculitis Society (EUVAS).
- To provide a comprehensive overview of long-term outcomes in ANCA-associated vasculitis patients.
- To focus on critical long-term endpoints including relapse rate, patient and renal survival, and the incidence of cardiovascular disease and malignancy.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of long-term follow-up data from patients with newly diagnosed AAV participating in independent EUVAS clinical trials since 1995.
- Stratification of patient groups based on renal function and disease localization (generalized vs. localized forms).
- Review of original randomized trials to assess treatment efficacy and potential adverse events over extended periods.
Main Results:
- While immediate survival has improved with immunosuppressive therapy, long-term outcomes, including relapse rates and adverse events, require further detailed evaluation.
- The heterogeneity of previous AAV patient cohorts necessitates a focused review of standardized trial data.
- Focus on long-term endpoints such as patient survival, renal survival, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy is essential for comprehensive AAV management.
Conclusions:
- Long-term follow-up is critical for understanding the full impact of AAV and its treatments.
- EUVAS trials provide a valuable, standardized dataset for evaluating long-term outcomes in AAV.
- Further analysis of these trials will inform strategies to mitigate long-term risks like relapse, cardiovascular events, and malignancy in AAV patients.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury III: Clinical Manifestations
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Chronic Inflammation: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction

