Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

11:02
The Use of an Automated System GreenFeed to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals
Published on: September 7, 2015
23.5K
Evaluating dispersion modeling options to estimate methane emissions from grazing beef cattle
Journal of Environmental Quality
|January 21, 2015
Summary
Cattle enteric methane (CH4) emissions were measured using atmospheric methods. Stocking density and source configuration affected CH4 output, with point sources showing more variation than area sources.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Environmental Science
- Atmospheric Science
Background:
- Enteric methane (CH4) emissions from cattle represent a significant greenhouse gas source and an energy loss, impacting livestock production efficiency.
- Accurate quantification of enteric CH4 emissions is crucial for evaluating mitigation strategies and understanding its environmental impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the influence of cattle stocking density on enteric CH4 emissions.
- To evaluate the effect of different source configurations (point vs. area source, and area source elevation) on CH4 emissions from grazing beef cattle.
- To validate the use of nonintrusive atmospheric measurements and gas dispersion modeling for estimating CH4 emissions.
Main Methods:
- Employed nonintrusive atmospheric measurements to quantify CH4 emissions from grazing beef cattle.
- Utilized a gas dispersion model to analyze emission data based on source configuration and stocking density.
- Compared CH4 emissions between point-source and area-source configurations, including elevated and ground-level area sources.
Main Results:
- Average measured enteric CH4 emission ranged from 240 to 250 g/animal/day for both point and area sources.
- No significant difference in CH4 emissions was observed between elevated (0.5 m) and ground-level (0 m) area sources.
- Stocking density influenced CH4 emissions in the point-source configuration, with some variations also noted for area-source emissions.
Conclusions:
- The study highlights the flexibility of the area-source configuration within the gas dispersion model for estimating CH4 emissions, even under low stocking densities.
- Findings contribute to a better understanding of factors affecting enteric CH4 emissions in beef cattle and inform mitigation efforts.
- Nonintrusive atmospheric measurements offer a viable method for assessing CH4 emissions in grazing systems.

