Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

5/6 Nephrectomy Using Sharp Bipolectomy Via Midline Laparotomy in Rats
Published on: April 4, 2025
How do We Manage Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with CKD and ESRD?
Hoon Young Choi1, Hyeong Cheon Park1, Sung Kyu Ha1
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) significantly increases cardiovascular event risk and mortality. Noninvasive methods are explored for diagnosing coronary artery disease in CKD patients, as invasive procedures pose challenges.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events.
- CKD patients face higher mortality from heart disease than kidney disease, with accelerated atherosclerosis due to hypertension, dyslipidemia, and altered calcium/phosphorus homeostasis.
- High mortality rates in dialysis patients, primarily due to cardiovascular disease, necessitate effective risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate noninvasive cardiac risk stratification as an alternative to invasive procedures like cardiac catheterization for asymptomatic CKD patients.
- To evaluate diagnostic, preventive, and treatment strategies for coronary artery disease (CAD) in uremic populations, considering differences from non-uremic populations.
- To compare the efficacy and risks of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in CKD patients.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on CKD, cardiovascular disease, and treatment modalities.
- Analysis of the accuracy of noninvasive diagnostic testing in uremic versus non-uremic populations.
- Comparison of outcomes for PCI with stenting and CABG, considering factors like recovery time, invasiveness, mortality, and long-term survival.
Main Results:
- CKD accelerates coronary artery atherosclerosis through mechanisms like hypertension and dyslipidemia, and causes vascular calcification.
- Noninvasive diagnostic testing is less accurate in uremic patients; dobutamine echocardiography shows promise.
- PCI with stenting offers faster recovery and reduced invasiveness but CABG provides better long-term survival and reduced repeat revascularizations; treatment decisions require individualization.
Conclusions:
- Effective management of CAD is crucial in uremic patients, but standard treatment modalities may not directly translate from non-uremic populations.
- Noninvasive diagnostic methods, such as dobutamine echocardiography, are needed for risk stratification in CKD patients.
- Individualized treatment decisions balancing risks and benefits of PCI versus CABG are essential, with further trials needed for optimal strategies.
Abstract:
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been shown to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events. In addition, patients with pre-dialysis CKD appear to be more likely to die of heart disease than of kidney disease. CKD accelerates coronary artery atherosclerosis by several mechanisms, notably hypertension and dyslipidemia, both of which are known risk factors for coronary artery disease. In addition, CKD alters calcium and phosphorus homeostasis, resulting in hypercalcemia and vascular calcification, including the coronary arteries. Mortality of patients on long-term dialysis therapy is high, with age-adjusted mortality rates of about 25% annually. Because the majority of deaths are caused by cardiovascular disease, routine cardiac catheterization of new dialysis patients was proposed as a means of improving the identification and treatment of high-risk patients. However, clinicians may be uncomfortable exposing asymptomatic patients to such invasive procedures like cardiac catheterization, thus noninvasive cardiac risk stratification was investigated widely as a more palatable alternative to routine diagnostic catheterization. The effective management of coronary artery disease is of paramount importance in uremic patients. The applicability of diagnostic, preventive, and treatment modalities developed in nonuremic populations to patients with kidney failure cannot necessarily be extrapolated from clinical studies in non-kidney failure populations. Noninvasive diagnostic testing in uremic patients is less accurate than in nonuremic populations. Initial data suggest that dobutamine echocardiography may be the preferred diagnostic method. PCI with stenting is a less favorable alternative to CABG, however, it has a faster recovery time, reduced invasiveness, and no overall mortality difference in nondiabetic and non-CKD patients compared with CABG. CABG is associated with reduced repeat revascularizations, greater relief of angina, and increased long term survival. However, CABG is associated with a higher incidence of post-operative risks. The treatment chosen for each patient should be an individualized decision based upon numerous risk factors. CKD is associated with higher rates of CAD, with 44% of all-cause mortality attributable to cardiac disease and about 20% from acute MI. Optimal treatment including aggressive lifestyle modifications and concomitant medical therapy should be implemented in all patients to maximize benefits from either PCI or CABG. Future prospective randomized controlled trials with newer second or third generation DES and bioabsorbable DES are necessary to determine if PCI may be non-inferior to CABG in the future.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations

