Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

05:37
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
2.8K
A permutation method to assess heterogeneity in external validation for risk prediction models.
1Department of Medical Research, Tzu Chi General Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan.
Plos One
|January 22, 2015
Summary
External validation of risk prediction models is crucial. A new permutation method assesses dataset homology, guiding model transportability and ensuring reliable clinical predictions.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Epidemiology
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- The reliability of risk prediction models hinges on their performance in external datasets.
- External validation is essential to ensure generalizability and clinical utility.
- Assessing heterogeneity between development and validation data is critical for model transportability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel permutation method for assessing heterogeneity in external validation of risk prediction models.
- To provide a quantitative measure (permutation p-value) of homology between development and external validation datasets.
- To evaluate the statistical properties and practical utility of the proposed permutation method.
Main Methods:
- A permutation-based approach was developed to quantify the similarity between model development and external validation datasets.
- Monte-Carlo simulations were performed to assess the statistical performance of the permutation method.
- The method was demonstrated using two independent microarray breast cancer datasets.
Main Results:
- The permutation p-value effectively measures the degree of homology between datasets.
- A p-value less than 0.05 suggests that the prediction model may require revision or updating for the external population.
- Simulations confirmed the method's statistical validity, and dataset analyses showed its practical applicability.
Conclusions:
- The proposed permutation method offers a straightforward and effective way to assess heterogeneity in external validation.
- This method aids in determining the suitability of risk prediction models for new populations.
- Routine implementation of this permutation method is recommended for robust external validation practices.
Related Concept Videos
Test for Homogeneity
2.6K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.6K
Data Validation
3.7K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.7K
Randomized Experiments
9.4K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.4K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
624
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
624
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II
665
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
665
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
8.9K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n) to the number of categories (k).
8.9K
