Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Full- versus Sub-Regional Quantification of Amyloid-Beta Load on Mouse Brain Sections
Published on: May 19, 2022
Brain amyloidosis ascertainment from cognitive, imaging, and peripheral blood protein measures
Liana G Apostolova1, Kristy S Hwang2, David Avila2
1From the Departments of Neurology (L.G.A., K.S.H., D.A., O.K., E.T., P.M.T.), Medicine Statistics Core (D.E.), and School of Nursing (S.S.), David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles; Institute for Neuroinformatics (P.M.T.), Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (E.T.); Department of Diagnostic Radiology (C.R.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Public Health and Neuroscience (W.J.J.), University of California, Berkeley; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (L.S., J.Q.T.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Radiology (M.W.W.), University of California, San Francisco; and Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center (M.W.W.), San Francisco, CA. lapostolova@mednet.ucla.edu.
Background:
The goal of this study was to identify a clinical biomarker signature of brain amyloidosis in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 1 (ADNI1) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) cohort.
Methods:
We developed a multimodal biomarker classifier for predicting brain amyloidosis using cognitive, imaging, and peripheral blood protein ADNI1 MCI data. We used CSF β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ42) ≤ 192 pg/mL as proxy measure for Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-PET standard uptake value ratio ≥ 1.5. We trained our classifier in the subcohort with CSF Aβ42 but no PiB-PET data and tested its performance in the subcohort with PiB-PET but no CSF Aβ42 data. We also examined the utility of our biomarker signature for predicting disease progression from MCI to Alzheimer dementia.
Results:
The CSF training classifier selected Mini-Mental State Examination, Trails B, Auditory Verbal Learning Test delayed recall, education, APOE genotype, interleukin 6 receptor, clusterin, and ApoE protein, and achieved leave-one-out accuracy of 85% (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.8). The PiB testing classifier achieved an AUC of 0.72, and when classifier self-tuning was allowed, AUC = 0.74. The 36-month disease-progression classifier achieved AUC = 0.75 and accuracy = 71%.
Conclusions:
Automated classifiers based on cognitive and peripheral blood protein variables can identify the presence of brain amyloidosis with a modest level of accuracy. Such methods could have implications for clinical trial design and enrollment in the near future.
Classification Of Evidence:
This study provides Class II evidence that a classification algorithm based on cognitive, imaging, and peripheral blood protein measures identifies patients with brain amyloid on PiB-PET with moderate accuracy (sensitivity 68%, specificity 78%).
More Related Videos
09:31Visualization of Amyloid β Deposits in the Human Brain with Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Imaging Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 7, 2019
08:25Detecting Amyloid-β Accumulation via Immunofluorescent Staining in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: April 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Alzheimer's Disease: Overview
The clinical diagnosis of AD hinges on the presence of memory and other cognitive impairments. Biomarkers, such as changes in Aβ...
Alzheimer Disease ll: Pathophysiology