Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Acquisition of Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data in the Rat
Published on: August 28, 2021
Pharmacological MRI response to a selective dopamine transporter inhibitor, GBR12909, in awake and anesthetized rats
Yuto Kashiwagi1, Takemi Rokugawa, Tomomi Yamada
1Department of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, Research Laboratory for Development, Shionogi and Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan; Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Abstract:
Pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI) is a powerful tool for imaging the effects of drugs on brain activity. In preclinical phMRI studies, general anesthesia used for minimizing head movements is thought to influence the phMRI responses to drugs. In this study we investigated the phMRI responses to a selective dopamine transporter (DAT) inhibitor, GBR12909, and a dopamine (DA) releaser, d-amphetamine (AMPH), in the isoflurane anesthetized and awake rats using a relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) method. AMPH (1 mg/kg i.p.) caused an increase in rCBV in the dopaminergic circuitry in the both anesthetized and awake rats. The striatal rCBV change was correlated with the change of the striatal DA concentration induced by AMPH in the both anesthetized and awake rats. GBR12909 (10 mg/kg i.p.) caused a positive rCBV response and showed a similar regional pattern of rCBV response to AMPH in the awake rats, and the correlation between the change of the striatal rCBV and the striatal DA concentration was observed. However, in the anesthetized rats, GBR12909 induced a widespread negative rCBV response, whereas an increase in striatal DA concentration was observed. These findings indicate that phMRI responses to activation of DA neurotransmission by GBR12909 or AMPH are overall identical in the awake state, while the phMRI response to a DAT inhibitor, GBR12909 but not to AMPH was changed by isoflurane anesthesia. For the evaluation of neuroactive drugs using phMRI, isoflurane anesthesia might be complicated the interpretation of pharmacodynamic effects of drugs in preclinical studies.

