Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Evaluation of quality indicators for Dutch community pharmacies using a comprehensive assessment framework
Tim W A Schoenmakers1, Martina Teichert, Jozé Braspenning
1Radboud University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. tim.schoenmakers@radboudumc.nl.
Only 25% of Dutch community pharmacy quality indicators (QIs) met all validity criteria. Improving QI validity requires defining meaningful pharmaceutical care outcomes and standardizing process measurement.
Area of Science:
- Pharmaceutical care quality assessment
- Health services research
- Indicator development and validation
Background:
- The Dutch Health Care Transparency Programme (Zichtbare Zorg) developed quality indicators (QIs) for healthcare, categorized for internal (formative) and external (summative) use.
- A comprehensive Indicator Assessment Framework (IAF) was established to validate QIs based on content validity, absence of selection bias, absence of measurement bias, and statistical reliability.
- The IAF was applied to assess the validity of QIs for Dutch community pharmacies, particularly those intended for summative use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of the 52 existing quality indicators (QIs) for community pharmacies in the Netherlands using the Indicator Assessment Framework (IAF).
Main Methods:
- An expert panel assessed 52 QIs from 1,807 Dutch community pharmacies using the IAF criteria.
- Judgments were categorized as meeting, partly meeting, or not meeting requirements for each criterion.
- Assessments considered QI type (structure, process, outcome) and predefined domains.
Main Results:
- Only 13 QIs (25%) met all IAF validity criteria, predominantly structure indicators (12) and one process indicator.
- Process indicators showed poor adherence to the measurement bias criterion.
- Outcome indicators demonstrated unsatisfactory content validity.
- The valid QIs covered 6 out of 10 domains, including continuity of care, clinical risk management, compounding, dispensing, management, and quality management.
Conclusions:
- A significant proportion of quality indicators for community pharmacies did not meet all validity requirements when assessed against the IAF.
- Enhancing the validity of process and outcome indicators necessitates clearer definitions of meaningful pharmaceutical care outcomes.
- Implementing uniform measurement standards for relevant processes is crucial for improving QI reliability and utility.
Related Concept Videos
Quality Assurance
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Nursing Assessment
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
