Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Quantifying the acute changes in glucose with exercise in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Fernando García-García1, Kavita Kumareswaran, Roman Hovorka
1Bioengineering and Telemedicine Group, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, fgarcia@gbt.tfo.upm.es.
Background:
The acute impact of different types of physical activity on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes has not been well quantified.
Objectives:
Our objective was to estimate the rate of change (RoC) in glucose concentration induced acutely during the performance of structured exercise and at recovery in subjects with type 1 diabetes.
Methods:
We searched for original articles in the PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Search terms included type 1 diabetes, blood glucose, physical activity, and exercise. Eligible studies (randomized controlled trials and non-randomized experiments) encompassed controlled physical activity sessions (continuous moderate [CONT], intermittent high intensity [IHE], resistance [RESIST], and/or a resting reference [REST]) and reported excursions in glucose concentration during exercise and after its cessation. Data were extracted by graph digitization to compute two RoC measures from population profiles: RoCE during exercise and RoCR in recovery.
Results:
Ten eligible studies were found from 540 publications. Meta-analyses of exercise modalities versus rest yielded the following: RoCE -4.43 mmol/L h(-1) (p < 0.00001, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.06 to -2.79) and RoCR +0.70 mmol/L h(-1) (p = 0.46, 95% CI -1.14 to +2.54) for CONT vs. REST; RoCE -5.25 mmol/L·h(-1) (p < 0.00001, 95 % CI -7.02 to -3.48) and RoCR +0.72 mmol/L h(-1) (p = 0.71, 95% CI -3.10 to +4.54) for IHE vs. REST; RoCE -2.61 mmol/L h(-1) (p = 0.30, 95% CI -7.55 to +2.34) and RoCR -0.02 mmol/L h(-1) (p = 1.00, 95% CI -7.58 to +7.53) for RESIST vs. REST.
Conclusions:
Novel RoC magnitudes RoCE, RoCR reflected rapid decays of glycemia during CONT exercise and gradual recoveries immediately afterwards. RESIST showed more constrained decays, whereas discrepancies were found for IHE.
More Related Videos
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
08:01Measurement of Insulin- and Contraction-Stimulated Glucose Uptake in Isolated and Incubated Mature Skeletal Muscle from Mice
Published on: May 16, 2021