Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Development and Maintenance of a Preclinical Patient Derived Tumor Xenograft Model for the Investigation of Novel Anti-Cancer Therapies
Published on: September 30, 2016
Survival in ampullary cancer: potential role of different KRAS mutations
Nakul P Valsangkar1, Thun Ingkakul1, Camilo Correa-Gallego1
1Department of Surgery, Andrew L. Warshaw, M.D. Institute for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Objective:
The prognosis of ampullary adenocarcinoma (AA) usually is favorable; however, a subset of AA have poor biology and outcomes similar to pancreatic cancer. Patients in this subset will have early recurrence and death usually within 2 years. To date, there are no genetic markers to identify these patients. This study identifies the high-risk subset of AA and evaluates the mutational status of KRAS in predicting poor outcome.
Methods:
The tumor registry of an academic center was reviewed for data on patients managed operatively with AA. KRAS genotypes were determined for these patients using a polymerase chain reaction-based assay on clinical specimens. Analysis of variance and χ(2) tests was used to categorize continuous and categorical variables. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox methods, respectively.
Results:
A total of 146 patients were identified with AA between 1982 and 2008. After stringent pathologic review, 97 patients were confirmed with AA, of whom 75 had tissue specimens available for analysis. Genotyping revealed 67% were wild-type (KRAS(WT)), and 33% were mutant for KRAS. Patients with KRAS(G12D) (n = 9), the most common mutational genotype, had poorer median survival (62 months) compared with those with KRAS(non-G12D) mutants (median survival not reached, mean 145 months) and KRAS(WT) patients (155 months, P = .05). Patients with survival ≤30 months were labeled "high-risk." Of the 9 patients with KRAS(G12D), 56% were in this high-risk subset, compared with 18% of KRAS(WT) (P = .02) and 31% of KRAS(non-G12D) (P > .05) populations. Patients with KRAS(G12D) also were more likely to present with advanced T stage.
Conclusion:
The KRAS(G12D) mutation identifies a subset of AA patients with poor prognoses and may be used to identify patients at risk of early recurrence and poorer survival who may benefit from adjuvant therapy.
More Related Videos
10:13A Multiplexed Luciferase-based Screening Platform for Interrogating Cancer-associated Signal Transduction in Cultured Cells
Published on: July 3, 2013
06:51Utilizing 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging and Quantitative Histology to Measure Dynamic Changes in the Glucose Metabolism in Mouse Models of Lung Cancer
Published on: July 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
The Ras Gene
Ras is a...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle