Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Myocardial viability for decision-making concerning revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction
Andrés Orlandini1, Noelia Castellana1, Andrea Pascual1
1ECLA (Estudios Clínicos Latino América), Argentina.
Insights
Myocardial viability tests are inconclusive for guiding revascularization in left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease (LVD-CAD) patients. While some studies suggest benefits, the evidence remains uncertain for both viable and non-viable myocardium groups.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Clinical Decision-Making
Background:
- Myocardial viability tests are crucial for revascularization decisions in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease (LVD-CAD).
- Assessing myocardial viability aims to optimize treatment strategies for improved patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze evidence comparing medical treatment with revascularization in LVD-CAD patients.
- To determine the impact of myocardial viability on mortality outcomes following revascularization versus medical management.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of 32 non-randomized and 4 randomized studies.
- Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing medical treatment with revascularization in LVD-CAD patients with known myocardial viability status.
- Primary outcome measure was mortality.
Main Results:
- Non-randomized studies suggested a mortality benefit from revascularization, particularly in patients with viable myocardium.
- Randomized studies showed no significant mortality benefit of revascularization, irrespective of myocardial viability.
- No significant difference in outcomes was observed between patients with and without viable myocardium in either study type.
Conclusions:
- Current data are inconclusive regarding the utility of myocardial viability tests in guiding revascularization decisions for LVD-CAD patients.
- While some evidence suggests potential benefit in viable myocardium, revascularization's effect remains uncertain, with neutral or adverse outcomes not excluded.
- Further high-quality research is needed to clarify the role of viability assessment in revascularization strategies.
Background:
Myocardial viability tests have been proposed as a key factor in the decision-making process concerning coronary revascularization procedures in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease (LVD-CAD).
Methods:
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that compared medical treatment with revascularization in patients with viable and non-viable myocardium and recorded mortality as outcome.
Results:
Thirty-two non-randomized (4328 patients) and 4 randomized (1079 patients) studies were analyzed. In non-randomized studies, revascularization provided a significant mortality benefit compared with medical treatment (p<0.05). Since the heterogeneity was significant (p<0.05) a viability subgroup analysis was performed, showing that revascularization provided a significant mortality benefit compared with medical treatment in patients with viable myocardium (p<0.05) but not in patients without (p=0.34). There was a significant subgroup effect (p<0.05) related to the intensity of the effect, but not to the direction. In randomized studies, revascularization did not provide a significant mortality benefit compared with medical treatment in either patients with viable myocardium or those without (p=0.21). There was no significant subgroup effect (p=0.72). Neither non-randomized nor randomized studies demonstrated any significant difference in outcomes between patients with and without viable myocardium.
Conclusions:
The available data are inconclusive regarding the usefulness of myocardial viability tests for the decision-making process concerning revascularization in LVD-CAD patients. Patients with viable myocardium appear to benefit from revascularization, but similar benefits were observed in patients without viable myocardium. Moreover, a neutral or adverse effect of revascularization cannot be excluded in either group of patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

