Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

7.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
7.3K
Regression Analysis01:11

Regression Analysis

9.1K
Regression analysis is a statistical tool that describes a mathematical relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables.
In regression analysis, a regression equation is determined based on the line of best fit– a line that best fits the data points plotted in a graph. This line is also called the regression line. The algebraic equation for the regression line is called the regression equation. It is represented as:
9.1K
Residuals and Least-Squares Property01:11

Residuals and Least-Squares Property

9.9K
The vertical distance between the actual value of y and the estimated value of y. In other words, it measures the vertical distance between the actual data point and the predicted point on the line
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...
9.9K
Variation01:19

Variation

8.4K
An important characteristic of any set of data is the variation in the data. In some data sets, the data values are concentrated closely near the mean; in other data sets, the data values are more widely spread out from the mean. The most common measure of variation, or spread, is the standard deviation, which is the square root of variance.
When independent and dependent variables are plotted on a scatter plot, the slope of a line is a value that describes the rate of change between the two...
8.4K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

9.3K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
9.3K
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient01:11

Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

8.6K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable, x, and the dependent variable, y. Hence, it is also known as the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. It can be calculated using the following equation:
8.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Convergent increases in serotonin 1B receptor binding following ketamine and electroconvulsive therapy: a multi-centre bayesian re-analysis of PET data.

Molecular psychiatry·2026
Same author

Elevated serotonin 1A receptor binding in borderline personality disorder co-morbid with major depressive episodes appears attributable to major depression alone.

Journal of psychiatric research·2026
Same author

BIVARIATE HIERARCHICAL BAYESIAN MODEL FOR COMBINING SUMMARY MEASURES AND THEIR UNCERTAINTIES FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES.

The annals of applied statistics·2026
Same author

Relationship between cortical electrical responsiveness and changes in regional cerebral oxygenation (rSO<sub>2</sub>) and return of spontaneous circulation in prolonged cardiac arrest: a multi-center observational study.

Resuscitation·2026
Same author

External validation and time-stability analysis of STARE, a blood-free quantification tool for irreversible PET tracers.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-crossover trial of treatment with a chemokine antagonist for knee osteoarthritis pain.

Pain·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.7K

A Paradoxical Result in Estimating Regression Coefficients.

Thaddeus Tarpey1, R Todd Ogden2, Eva Petkova3

  • 1Professor in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Wright State University, Day-ton, Ohio 45435.

The American Statistician
|January 27, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Adding more data can surprisingly reduce the precision of regression slope coefficient estimates. This study explores why including baseline predictors across treatment groups in randomized experiments can worsen slope estimator accuracy.

Keywords:
Jensen’s inequalitymoderator analysispooled variance estimatorratio estimator

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

8.7K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.9K

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • Regression analysis is a fundamental statistical technique.
  • Estimating coefficients accurately is crucial for valid inferences.
  • Randomized experiments aim to balance baseline characteristics across groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the counterintuitive phenomenon where increased information can decrease estimator precision.
  • To identify the conditions under which pooling baseline predictors across treatment groups degrades slope estimator accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of regression slope coefficient estimation.
  • Examination of data from randomized experiments.
  • Simulation studies to explore the impact of pooling predictors.

Main Results:

  • Demonstration that pooling baseline predictors across treatment groups can paradoxically reduce the precision of slope estimators.
  • Identification of specific scenarios where this precision deterioration occurs.

Conclusions:

  • The inclusion of additional baseline information does not always enhance estimation precision in randomized trials.
  • Careful consideration of predictor pooling strategies is necessary to maintain estimator accuracy.