Data to action: using environmental public health tracking to inform decision making
Judith R Qualters1, Heather M Strosnider, Rosalyn Bell
1Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, Office of Non-infectious Diseases, Injury and Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
The National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program and Network effectively use data and expertise to drive public health actions. These resources enhance surveillance and data analysis, leading to improved community health outcomes and interventions.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Public Health
- Public Health Surveillance
- Health Data Integration
Background:
- Public health surveillance is crucial for disseminating data to inform disease prevention and control actions.
- The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program (Tracking Program) emphasizes a data-to-action approach.
- The CDC's National Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (Tracking Network) integrates health and environmental data to support public health action (PHA).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and utility of the Tracking Program and Tracking Network in environmental public health practice.
- To assess the role of the Tracking Program and Network in informing environmental public health policy making.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of public health actions (PHAs) driven by Tracking Program grantees (states, cities) funded between 2005 and 2013.
- Categorization of 178 reported PHAs to understand grantee involvement, roles, problems addressed, and actions taken.
- Case studies were used to illustrate the practical utility of the Tracking Program and Network.
Main Results:
- Tracking grantees reported 178 PHAs, with common actions including providing information and improving public health programs or response plans.
- The Tracking Program's primary roles were enhancing surveillance (24%) and data analysis (23%).
- Concerns about health outcomes, exposures, or hazard-health associations initiated 47% of PHAs, often driven by requests for assistance or routine program work.
Conclusions:
- The data, expertise, and infrastructure of the Tracking Program and Network are instrumental in driving state and local public health actions.
- The findings demonstrate the value of integrated environmental health data for improving public health practice and policy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Investigation of Disease Outbreaks
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Introduction to Epidemiology
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...


