Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Combinatorial Gene Control02:33

Combinatorial Gene Control

10.4K
Combinatorial gene control is the synergistic action of several transcriptional factors to regulate the expression of a single gene. The absence of one or more of these factors may lead to a significant difference in the level of gene expression or repression.
The expression of more than 30,000 genes is controlled by approximately 2000-3000 transcription factors. This is possible because a single transcription factor can recognize more than one regulatory sequence. The specificity in gene...
10.4K
Master Transcription Regulators02:23

Master Transcription Regulators

8.0K
Master transcription regulators are regulatory proteins that are predominantly responsible for regulating the expression of multiple genes. Often these genes work in concert to drive a  complex process. Activation of a master transcription regulator can lead to a cascade of transcriptional activation necessary for that outcome. These regulators can directly bind to the regulatory sequences of the various genes involved, or they can indirectly regulate transcription by binding to regulatory...
8.0K
Master Transcription Regulators02:23

Master Transcription Regulators

2.9K
2.9K
Co-activators and Co-repressors02:04

Co-activators and Co-repressors

9.1K
Gene transcription is regulated by the synergistic action of several proteins that form a complex at a gene regulatory site. This is observed in eukaryotes, where the regulation of gene expression is a complex process. Regulatory proteins in eukaryotes can broadly be classified into two types – regulators that bind directly to specific DNA sequences and co-regulators that associate with regulatory proteins but cannot directly bind to the DNA. These co-regulators are further divided into...
9.1K
Co-activators and Co-repressors02:04

Co-activators and Co-repressors

3.3K
3.3K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.6K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

PWO proteins are associated with PRC2 since their emergence in vascular plants.

The New phytologist·2026
Same author

Chromatin-associated DEK proteins maintain H3K27me3 balance and coordinate developmental transitions in plants.

The New phytologist·2025
Same author

Polycomb repressive complex 2 facilitates the transition from heterotrophy to photoautotrophy during seedling emergence.

The Plant cell·2025
Same author

The Expansion and Diversification of Epigenetic Regulatory Networks Underpins Major Transitions in the Evolution of Land Plants.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same author

TORquing chromatin: the regulatory role of TOR kinase in chromatin function.

Journal of experimental botany·2024
Same author

Advances in plant chromatin.

The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology·2024
Same journal

Long-Range Signals Built upon Plant Structural Continuity.

Annual review of plant biology·2026
Same journal

The Power of Symbiosis in Life and Science.

Annual review of plant biology·2026
Same journal

RNA Meets Agriculture: From Molecular Mechanisms to Market Applications.

Annual review of plant biology·2026
Same journal

Sensing Plant Photosynthesis Using Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence: From Chloroplasts to the Globe.

Annual review of plant biology·2026
Same journal

The Structure and Function of the Chloroplast Import Apparatus.

Annual review of plant biology·2026
Same journal

A Multidimensional View of Biomolecular Condensates in Plant Biology.

Annual review of plant biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

A Method to Study de novo Formation of Chromatin Domains
07:34

A Method to Study de novo Formation of Chromatin Domains

Published on: August 23, 2019

5.9K

The polycomb group protein regulatory network.

Iva Mozgova1, Lars Hennig

  • 1Department of Plant Biology, Uppsala BioCenter, and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden; email: iva.mozgova@slu.se , lars.hennig@slu.se.

Annual Review of Plant Biology
|January 27, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Polycomb repressive complexes (PRCs) regulate gene expression for cell identity during development. This review explores plant PRC functions, targeting, and flexible repression mechanisms, comparing them with animal models.

Keywords:
Polycomb repressive complexTrithoraxepigeneticsgene repressionplant development

More Related Videos

Toxicological Assays for Testing Effects of an Epigenetic Drug on Development, Fecundity and Survivorship of Malaria Mosquitoes
10:26

Toxicological Assays for Testing Effects of an Epigenetic Drug on Development, Fecundity and Survivorship of Malaria Mosquitoes

Published on: January 16, 2015

8.9K
HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries
10:10

HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries

Published on: March 31, 2019

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

A Method to Study de novo Formation of Chromatin Domains
07:34

A Method to Study de novo Formation of Chromatin Domains

Published on: August 23, 2019

5.9K
Toxicological Assays for Testing Effects of an Epigenetic Drug on Development, Fecundity and Survivorship of Malaria Mosquitoes
10:26

Toxicological Assays for Testing Effects of an Epigenetic Drug on Development, Fecundity and Survivorship of Malaria Mosquitoes

Published on: January 16, 2015

8.9K
HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries
10:10

HOX Loci Focused CRISPR/sgRNA Library Screening Identifying Critical CTCF Boundaries

Published on: March 31, 2019

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics
  • Developmental Biology
  • Plant Science

Background:

  • Multicellular organism development relies on precise spatiotemporal gene expression for cell identity.
  • Polycomb repressive complexes (PRCs) and Trithorax group proteins are key epigenetic regulators of gene activation and repression.
  • PRCs are traditionally viewed as stable gene repressors, but emerging evidence highlights their dynamic roles in response to environmental and developmental signals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advancements in understanding plant Polycomb repressive complexes (PRCs).
  • To elucidate the composition, targeting mechanisms, and functional roles of plant PRCs.
  • To compare and contrast plant and animal PRC mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current research on plant PRCs.
  • Analysis of studies on PRC composition and protein interactions.
  • Examination of research on epigenetic gene regulation in plants and animals.

Main Results:

  • Plant PRCs exhibit complex compositions and dynamic targeting mechanisms.
  • Evidence suggests flexible and responsive gene repression by plant PRCs, extending beyond stable silencing.
  • Significant parallels and distinctions exist between plant and animal PRC functions and regulation.

Conclusions:

  • Plant PRCs play crucial roles in maintaining cell identity and development through adaptable epigenetic control.
  • Understanding plant PRC flexibility is key to deciphering complex developmental processes.
  • Comparative studies of plant and animal PRCs offer insights into conserved and divergent epigenetic regulatory strategies.