Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

9.2K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
9.2K
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

588
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
588
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

1.5K
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
1.5K
Sound Waves: Interference00:53

Sound Waves: Interference

5.3K
Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...
5.3K
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

2.5K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detection of culprit presence in multiple-culprit crimes: A comparison of combined and separate lineup-presentation formats.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Validating a multinomial processing tree model for measuring confidence in lineups using a post-response feedback manipulation.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Data from three experiments on auditory attention and distraction in autistic and nonautistic adults.

Data in brief·2026
Same author

Don't Listen to Yourself!

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.2K

Specific foreknowledge reduces auditory distraction by irrelevant speech.

Jan Philipp Röer1, Raoul Bell1, Axel Buchner1

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|January 27, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Foreknowledge of irrelevant speech significantly reduces its disruptive effect on short-term memory. Specific information about upcoming auditory distractors, not just a general warning, is key to mitigating this distraction.

More Related Videos

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

17.0K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.2K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

17.0K
Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Perception
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Irrelevant speech commonly disrupts short-term memory performance.
  • The inevitability and control mechanisms of auditory distraction are not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if foreknowledge of an imminent distractor sequence can modulate the disruptive effects of irrelevant speech.
  • To determine the specificity of foreknowledge required to attenuate auditory distraction.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a digit memory task while ignoring background speech.
  • Experiments manipulated foreknowledge of the distractor speech (auditory, visual, or none).
  • Disruption levels were compared across conditions with and without specific foreknowledge.

Main Results:

  • Specific foreknowledge of the to-be-ignored speech significantly attenuated its disruptive effect.
  • Foreknowledge presented visually was sufficient to reduce distraction.
  • Only specific, not general, foreknowledge yielded beneficial effects.
  • Foreknowledge effects were more pronounced for meaningful, variable speech than random words.

Conclusions:

  • Disruption from irrelevant speech is not solely a stimulus-driven process.
  • Top-down control mechanisms, specifically foreknowledge, can modulate auditory distraction.
  • Specific knowledge about upcoming distractors enhances the ability to ignore them.