Phase II study of everolimus and letrozole in patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma

Brian M Slomovitz1, Yunyun Jiang1, Melinda S Yates1

  • 1Brian M. Slomovitz, Yunyun Jiang, Melinda S. Yates, Pamela T. Soliman, Taren Johnston, Charles Levenback, Qian Zhang, Kari Ring, Mark F. Munsell, David M. Gershenson, Karen H. Lu, and Robert L. Coleman, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Brian M. Slomovitz and Maureen Nowakowski, Morristown Medical Center, Morristown, NJ; and Brian M. Slomovitz, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.

Abstract

Insights

Everolimus and letrozole show promise for treating recurrent endometrial cancer (EC), offering a clinical benefit rate of 40% and an objective response rate of 32% in a phase II trial.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Endometrial cancer (EC) frequently exhibits dysregulation of the phosphoinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway.
  • While hormonal manipulation can be effective, resistance often emerges due to PI3K pathway activation.
  • Targeting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) presents a potential strategy to overcome endocrine resistance in EC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of everolimus in combination with letrozole in women with recurrent endometrial cancer.
  • To assess the clinical benefit rate (CBR) and objective response rate (RR) of this combination therapy.

Main Methods:

  • A two-institution phase II trial was conducted involving patients with incurable, measurable recurrent EC who had received up to two prior cytotoxic regimens.
  • Everolimus (10 mg daily) and letrozole (2.5 mg daily) were administered orally in 4-week cycles until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or complete response.
  • The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as complete response (CR), partial response, or stable disease (≥ 16 weeks) per RECIST 1.0 criteria.

Main Results:

  • The study enrolled 38 patients; 35 were evaluable for response. The overall CBR was 40% (14/35), with a median of 15 cycles among responders.
  • The confirmed objective response rate (RR) was 32% (11/35), including nine CRs and two partial responses.
  • Patients with endometrioid histology and CTNNB1 mutations showed a favorable response, while serous histology predicted a lack of response. No treatment-discontinuting toxicity was observed.

Conclusions:

  • The combination of everolimus and letrozole demonstrates a high clinical benefit rate and objective response rate in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer.
  • This combination therapy is a promising option for recurrent EC, particularly for those with endometrioid histology.
  • Further investigation and development of this therapeutic strategy in recurrent endometrioid EC are warranted.