Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

9.5K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
9.5K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.8K
2.8K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

3.3K
3.3K
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators02:04

Covalently Linked Protein Regulators

10.0K
Proteins can undergo many types of post-translational modifications, often in response to changes in their environment. These modifications play an important role in the function and stability of these proteins. Covalently linked molecules include functional groups, such as methyl, acetyl, and phosphate groups, and also small proteins, such as ubiquitin. There are around 200 different types of covalent regulators that have been identified.
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein....
10.0K
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators02:04

Covalently Linked Protein Regulators

2.1K
2.1K
The Two-State Receptor Model01:29

The Two-State Receptor Model

3.6K
The two-state receptor model explains a drug's interaction with receptors, such as G protein-coupled receptors and ligand-gated ion channels, to induce or inhibit a biological response. When no natural ligands are present, a receptor exists in an equilibrium of inactive (Ri) and active (Ra) conformations. The inactive form does not produce a response, while the active form generates a basal effect known as constitutive activity.
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...
3.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MAMMAL - Molecular Aligned Multi-Modal Architecture and Language for biomedical discovery.

npj drug discovery·2026
Same author

Engineering Endogenous T Cell Receptors to Recognize Cancer Neoantigens Using a Hybrid Physics-AI Approach.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Solvent Environment Influences Molecular Conformation and Electron Transport in Peptides.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Mapping Strigolactone Hydrolysis in DWARF14 via QM/MM String Method.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

De novo Folding Mechanisms of Lasso Peptides.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Dynamic mechanism for subtype selectivity of endocannabinoids.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion
09:17

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.7K

Markov state models provide insights into dynamic modulation of protein function.

Diwakar Shukla1, Carlos X Hernández, Jeffrey K Weber

  • 1Department of Chemistry, ‡Biophysics Program, and §SIMBIOS, NIH Center for Biomedical Computation, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.

Accounts of Chemical Research
|January 28, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Markov state models (MSMs) offer a powerful framework for understanding complex protein dynamics and function. These models efficiently sample protein conformational changes, revealing key molecular switches and pathways critical for cellular signaling and disease.

More Related Videos

Spatiotemporal Control of Protein Activity through Optogenetic Allosteric Regulation
08:00

Spatiotemporal Control of Protein Activity through Optogenetic Allosteric Regulation

Published on: October 4, 2024

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells
06:48

Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells

Published on: January 5, 2024

6.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion
09:17

Structure-Based Simulation and Sampling of Transcription Factor Protein Movements along DNA from Atomic-Scale Stepping to Coarse-Grained Diffusion

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.7K
Spatiotemporal Control of Protein Activity through Optogenetic Allosteric Regulation
08:00

Spatiotemporal Control of Protein Activity through Optogenetic Allosteric Regulation

Published on: October 4, 2024

1.2K
Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells
06:48

Author Spotlight: Evaluation of Protein-Condensate Dynamics in Live Human Cells

Published on: January 5, 2024

6.0K

Area of Science:

  • Computational biophysics
  • Structural biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Protein function is intrinsically linked to dynamic conformational changes.
  • Traditional static structural views limit understanding of functional dynamics.
  • Observing rare dynamical transitions in simulations is computationally challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the application of Markov state models (MSMs) for analyzing protein dynamics.
  • To highlight MSMs' ability to efficiently sample diverse timescales and identify key conformational states.
  • To demonstrate how MSMs provide insights into protein function and disease mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Construction of Markov state models from molecular dynamics simulations.
  • Analysis of conformational landscapes and transition pathways.
  • Integration with nonequilibrium statistical mechanics for in vivo relevance.

Main Results:

  • MSMs enable efficient sampling of protein dynamics across multiple timescales.
  • Identification of "molecular switches" governing protein function (e.g., in GPCRs and kinases).
  • Revealed multiple pathways for protein state transitions and the impact of ligand binding.
  • Uncovered dynamically frozen, β-sheet-rich states potentially linked to amyloid formation.
  • Characterized the dynamics of intrinsically disordered proteins.

Conclusions:

  • MSMs provide a robust statistical framework for understanding complex protein dynamics.
  • They offer a human-readable view of essential conformational changes and functional implications.
  • MSMs connect in vitro simulations to in vivo nonequilibrium conditions, advancing our understanding of protein behavior in cellular environments.