Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

04:27
Anterior Capsular Reconstruction with Human Dermal Allograft for Irreparable Subscapularis Tears
Published on: May 9, 2025
674
Acromioclavicular third degree dislocation: surgical treatment in acute cases
Angelo De Carli1, Riccardo Maria Lanzetti2, Alessandro Ciompi3
1Orthopaedic Unit and "Kirk Kilgour" Sports Injury Centre, S. Andrea Hospital, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Italy, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy. angelo.decarli@gmail.com.
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
|January 29, 2015
Summary
Surgical treatment for acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation showed better subjective and radiographic outcomes than conservative management. However, objective scores were similar, suggesting surgery isn't routinely necessary for type III ACJ injuries.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Sports Medicine
- Traumatology
Background:
- Management of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is debated.
- This study compares conservative versus surgical treatment in young athletes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative and surgical treatments for acute type III ACJ injuries in active participants under 35.
- To analyze patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and shoulder function after a minimum 24-month follow-up.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 72 patients with acute type III ACJ dislocations (2006-2011).
- Group A: 25 patients treated conservatively. Group B: 30 patients treated surgically with TightRope™ system.
- Clinical scores (Constant, UCLA, ASES, ACJI) and radiographic measurements were assessed.
Main Results:
- Subjective parameters favored the surgical group; ACJI scores were significantly better in the surgical group (87.9 vs 72.4).
- Radiographic evaluations showed significant improvements in the surgical group.
- Objective scores (Constant, ASES, UCLA) were similar between groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
- Surgical treatment yielded better subjective and radiographic results for type III ACJ dislocations.
- Despite improved subjective outcomes, objective scores did not differ significantly, questioning the routine use of surgery.

