Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

1.0K
McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
1.0K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

483
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
483
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.7K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.7K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

3.6K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
3.6K
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

638
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
638
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.6K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Levofloxacin 750-mg for 5 days for the treatment of hospitalized Fine Risk Class III/IV community-acquired pneumonia patients.

Respiratory medicine·2006
Same author

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, retrospective comparison of 5- and 10-day regimens of levofloxacin in a subgroup of patients aged > or =65 years with community-acquired pneumonia.

Clinical therapeutics·2005
Same author

Clinical implications of 750 mg, 5-day levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Current medical research and opinion·2004
Same author

Efficacy of 750-mg, 5-day levofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia caused by atypical pathogens.

Current medical research and opinion·2004
Same author

High-dose, short-course levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia: a new treatment paradigm.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2003
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
05:07

Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice

Published on: August 25, 2023

2.2K

On two-sample McNemar test.

Jim X Xiang1

  • 1a Department of Biostatistics , Janssen Research and Development , Raritan , New Jersey , USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|January 29, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The McNemar test assesses symptom changes. A new two-sample McNemar test corrects inflated type I errors found in previous methods, improving statistical accuracy for comparing treatments.

Keywords:
Asymptotic normalitycrossover designhypothesis testingpaired binary datapseudolikelihood.

More Related Videos

Flypub To Study Ethanol Induced Behavioral Disinhibition and Sensitization
08:13

Flypub To Study Ethanol Induced Behavioral Disinhibition and Sensitization

Published on: May 18, 2020

7.1K
Novel Assay for Cold Nociception in Drosophila Larvae
06:52

Novel Assay for Cold Nociception in Drosophila Larvae

Published on: April 3, 2017

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice
05:07

Author Spotlight: Improved Localization and Monitoring of Coronary Flow Reserve Using Modified PLAX View in Mice

Published on: August 25, 2023

2.2K
Flypub To Study Ethanol Induced Behavioral Disinhibition and Sensitization
08:13

Flypub To Study Ethanol Induced Behavioral Disinhibition and Sensitization

Published on: May 18, 2020

7.1K
Novel Assay for Cold Nociception in Drosophila Larvae
06:52

Novel Assay for Cold Nociception in Drosophila Larvae

Published on: April 3, 2017

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Background:

  • The McNemar test is commonly used to evaluate changes in paired nominal data, such as disease symptom presence before and after treatment.
  • Comparing two treatments often involves a two-sample McNemar test, but its statistical properties require scrutiny.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the statistical performance of the two-sample McNemar test proposed by Feuer and Kessler (1989).
  • To propose a novel two-sample McNemar test that offers improved control over Type I error rates.
  • To explore the relationship between two-sample McNemar tests and the analysis of 2x2 crossover designs.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical analysis of hypothesis testing procedures.
  • Development and validation of a new two-sample McNemar test statistic.
  • Comparison of Type I error rates between existing and proposed methods.

Main Results:

  • The Feuer and Kessler (1989) two-sample McNemar test demonstrates a tendency to inflate Type I error rates.
  • The newly proposed two-sample McNemar test effectively preserves the desired Type I error rate.
  • A clear link is established between the two-sample McNemar test and the test for equal residual effects in 2x2 crossover designs.

Conclusions:

  • The existing two-sample McNemar test may lead to inaccurate conclusions due to inflated Type I errors.
  • The proposed two-sample McNemar test provides a more reliable method for comparing paired dichotomous data, especially in treatment comparisons.
  • Understanding the limitations and applications of these tests is crucial for robust clinical trial analysis.