Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Cone Beam Intraoperative Computed Tomography-based Image Guidance for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Published on: August 6, 2019
Can We Tell if the Syndesmosis Is Reduced Using Fluoroscopy?
Scott J Koenig1, Paul Tornetta, Gabriel Merlin
1*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, CA; †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA; ‡NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY; §University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; and ‖University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA.
Experienced surgeons can accurately assess fibular reduction using fluoroscopy, especially when comparing to the uninjured ankle. Contralateral views improve accuracy in identifying syndesmotic malreduction.
Area of Science:
- Orthopaedic Surgery
- Radiology
- Biomechanical Analysis
Background:
- Accurate reduction of the fibula in relation to the tibia is crucial for ankle syndesmosis stability.
- Fluoroscopic imaging is commonly used intraoperatively to assess reduction.
- Determining subtle sagittal plane displacement can be challenging.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate orthopedic surgeons' ability to detect fibular malreduction in the sagittal plane using fluoroscopic images.
- To assess the utility of comparing fluoroscopic images with the contralateral (uninjured) ankle.
- To determine interobserver reliability in identifying fibular displacement.
Main Methods:
- Lateral radiographs of cadaveric ankles with simulated 2.5 mm and 5 mm anterior/posterior fibular translations were created.
- Four orthopedic trauma surgeons assessed randomly selected images, distinguishing between reduced and displaced fibulae.
- Sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and interobserver reliability (kappa statistic) were calculated.
Main Results:
- Surgeons demonstrated higher accuracy in identifying malreduction (NPV 95% ipsilateral, 85% contralateral) than reduction.
- Sensitivity for detecting reduction was 94% for the ipsilateral ankle and 68% for the contralateral ankle.
- Anterior displacement and larger displacements (5 mm) were diagnosed more easily; 2.5 mm posterior displacement was most difficult. Intraobserver agreement was excellent for anterior displacement and 5 mm displacements.
Conclusions:
- Experienced surgeons can achieve and assess fibular reduction within 2.5 mm of translation.
- Fluoroscopic comparison with the contralateral normal ankle aids significantly in identifying syndesmotic malreduction.
- While the acceptable degree of syndesmotic displacement remains undefined, these findings suggest a high level of diagnostic capability for experienced surgeons.
More Related Videos
12:25C-arm-Free Simultaneous OLIF51 and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Single Lateral Position
Published on: September 16, 2022
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024