Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Interference between dental electrical devices and pacemakers or defibrillators: results from a prospective clinical
Background:
The authors aimed to determine whether electrical dental devices would interfere with the function of cardiac pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in humans.
Methods:
The authors exposed asymptomatic nonpacemaker-dependent patients to commonly used electrical dental equipment (for example, battery-operated curing lights, ultrasonic baths, ultrasonic scalers, electric pulp testers, and electric toothbrushes) in an outpatient cardiology clinic. The authors operated dental devices at various distances and programmed cardiac devices to sense and pace. The authors obtained cardiac tracings using a cardiac programming unit and a cardiac provider who noted any interference interpreted the results in real time.
Results:
The authors enrolled 32 consecutive patients and tested 12 pacemakers and 20 ICDs. They did not observe any significant clinical interference in sensing and pacing functions in any patient; however, they noted minor interference without clinical impact in the telemetry from the cardiac programming unit during use of the ultrasonic scaler and bath.
Conclusions:
The findings of this prospective study suggest that electrical devices commonly used in dental practices do not interfere with the sensing and pacing of contemporary cardiac patients' pacemakers or ICDs. However, they do interfere with the telemetry from the cardiac programming unit, without any clinical impact on patient safety. These findings should help in the development of clinical guidelines regarding dental management of patients with pacemakers or ICDs.
Practical Implications:
Electrical dental devices (for example, ultrasonic baths, ultrasonic scalers) induced minor interference with programmers that interrogate cardiac devices implanted in patients; however, overall, dental devices do not appear to interfere with pacemakers' and defibrillators' pacing and sensing function.
More Related Videos
11:46Investigation of the Electrophysiological and Thermographic Safety Parameters of Surgical Energy Devices During Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery in a Porcine Model
Published on: October 13, 2022
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Mechanism of Cardiac Arrhythmias
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias