Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 18, 2026

Methane Hydrate Crystallization on Sessile Water Droplets
Published on: May 26, 2021
Prediction of the phase equilibria of methane hydrates using the direct phase coexistence methodology
Vasileios K Michalis1, Joseph Costandy1, Ioannis N Tsimpanogiannis2
1Chemical Engineering Program, Texas A&M University at Qatar, P.O. Box 23847, Doha, Qatar.
Abstract:
The direct phase coexistence method is used for the determination of the three-phase coexistence line of sI methane hydrates. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are carried out in the isothermal-isobaric ensemble in order to determine the coexistence temperature (T3) at four different pressures, namely, 40, 100, 400, and 600 bar. Methane bubble formation that results in supersaturation of water with methane is generally avoided. The observed stochasticity of the hydrate growth and dissociation processes, which can be misleading in the determination of T3, is treated with long simulations in the range of 1000-4000 ns and a relatively large number of independent runs. Statistical averaging of 25 runs per pressure results in T3 predictions that are found to deviate systematically by approximately 3.5 K from the experimental values. This is in good agreement with the deviation of 3.15 K between the prediction of TIP4P/Ice water force field used and the experimental melting temperature of ice Ih. The current results offer the most consistent and accurate predictions from MD simulation for the determination of T3 of methane hydrates. Methane solubility values are also calculated at the predicted equilibrium conditions and are found in good agreement with continuum-scale models.
Related Concept Videos
Phase Diagrams of Ternary Systems
Phase Diagrams
Phase Transitions: Sublimation and Deposition
Phase Diagram
Phase Diagram
Inductive Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview

