Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

10.5K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
10.5K
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

174
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
174
Critical Values01:31

Critical Values

10.9K
A critical value is a definite value obtained from a particular probability distribution at a predecided confidence level (or a predecided significance level) for a given population parameter. The critical value provides demarcation that separates the sample statistics that are likely to occur from the ones that are unlikely to occur based on the given probability distribution and the population parameter to be estimated. The critical value for normal distribution is obtained from the z...
10.9K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

5.0K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
5.0K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

8.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
8.4K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

12.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
12.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Discovery of TNG908: A Selective, Brain Penetrant, MTA-Cooperative PRMT5 Inhibitor That Is Synthetically Lethal with <i>MTAP</i>-Deleted Cancers.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2024
Same author

Optimizing the Therapeutic Window of Targeted Drugs in Oncology: Potency-Guided First-in-Human Studies.

Clinical and translational science·2020
Same author

Chemoenzymatic strategy for the synthesis of site-specifically labeled immunoconjugates for multimodal PET and optical imaging.

Bioconjugate chemistry·2014
Same author

An official American Thoracic Society statement: diagnosis and management of beryllium sensitivity and chronic beryllium disease.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2014
Same author

Rational Design, Synthesis, and SAR of a Novel Thiazolopyrimidinone Series of Selective PI3K-beta Inhibitors.

ACS medicinal chemistry letters·2014
Same author

Demand forecasting and capacity management in primary care.

Physician executive·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

7.5K

"Quasi nonparametric" upper tolerance limits for occupational exposure evaluations.

Charles B Davis1, Paul F Wambach

  • 1a EnviroStat , Las Vegas , Nevada.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
|February 4, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Quasi-nonparametric upper tolerance limits (QNP UTLs) allow regulatory comparisons with fewer observations. These robust methods simplify risk assessment for occupational exposure limits (OELs).

Keywords:
censored dataexposure limitsnondetectsreporting limitsuncensored dataupper tolerance limits

More Related Videos

Employing the Forced Oscillation Technique for the Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics in Adults
06:11

Employing the Forced Oscillation Technique for the Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics in Adults

Published on: February 9, 2022

6.7K
Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface
10:10

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Published on: February 23, 2020

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

7.5K
Employing the Forced Oscillation Technique for the Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics in Adults
06:11

Employing the Forced Oscillation Technique for the Assessment of Respiratory Mechanics in Adults

Published on: February 9, 2022

6.7K
Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface
10:10

Assessment of the Acute Inhalation Toxicity of Airborne Particles by Exposing Cultivated Human Lung Cells at the Air-Liquid Interface

Published on: February 23, 2020

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Environmental Science
  • Statistical Analysis

Background:

  • Upper tolerance limits (UTLs) are crucial for comparing exposure data against occupational exposure limits (OELs) or regulatory criteria (RC).
  • Traditional nonparametric UTLs (NPUTLs) require a large number of observations (e.g., 59), which can be impractical for clean environments or small studies.
  • A need exists for UTL methods that require fewer data points while maintaining statistical rigor.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate quasi-nonparametric upper tolerance limits (QNP UTLs) as a more efficient alternative to NPUTLs.
  • To demonstrate the applicability of QNP UTLs in situations where fewer observations are available.
  • To highlight the ease of use and robustness of QNP UTLs in risk management decisions.

Main Methods:

  • QNP UTLs are derived based on a conservative assumption of a lognormal distribution with a maximum log-scale standard deviation of 2.0.
  • Specific thresholds are defined: passing requires 59 values below RC, 30 below 1/2 RC, 21 below 1/3 RC, and 8 below 1/10 RC.
  • The statistical performance of QNP UTLs was assessed for various data distributions and insensitivity to analytical variation was considered.

Main Results:

  • QNP UTLs provide a conservative and robust method for risk assessment, often described as 'quasi-nonparametric'.
  • These methods significantly reduce the number of observations needed to make conservative risk management decisions compared to NPUTLs.
  • QNP UTLs are easy to implement and do not encounter issues related to reporting limits (RLs).

Conclusions:

  • QNP UTLs offer a practical and statistically sound approach for comparing exposure data to OELs and RCs.
  • Their reduced data requirement makes them particularly valuable for efficient risk management in occupational settings.
  • The robustness and ease of use of QNP UTLs support their adoption in industrial hygiene and environmental monitoring.