Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

An In Vivo Estrogen Deficiency Mouse Model for Screening Exogenous Estrogen Treatments of Cardiovascular Dysfunction After Menopause
Published on: August 13, 2019
Placebo improvement in pharmacologic treatment of menopausal hot flashes: time course, duration, and predictors
Ellen W Freeman1, Kristine E Ensrud, Joseph C Larson
1From the Department of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Psychiatry (Freeman), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Division of Epidemiology and Community Health (Ensrud), Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Health System, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Medicine (Ensrud), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; MsFlash Data Coordinating Center (Larson, Guthrie), Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; School of Nursing (Carpenter), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Psychiatry (Joffe), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychosocial (Joffe) Dana Farber Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Group Health Research Institute (Newton), Seattle, Washington; Division of Research (Sternfeld), Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, California; Women's Health Center, Family and Preventive Medicine (LaCroix), University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Objectives:
To characterize the time course, duration of improvement, and clinical predictors of placebo response in treatment of menopausal hot flashes.
Methods:
Data were pooled from two trials conducted in the Menopausal Strategies: Finding Lasting Answers to Symptoms and Health network, providing a combined placebo group (n = 247) and a combined active treatment group (n = 297). Participants recorded hot flash frequency in diaries twice daily during treatment (Weeks 0-8) and subsequent follow-up (Weeks 9-11). The primary outcome variable was clinically significant improvement, defined as a 50% or greater decrease in hot flash frequency from baseline and calculated for each week in the study. Subgroups were defined a priori using standard clinical definitions for significant improvement and partial improvement. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants were evaluated as predictors of improvement.
Results:
Clinically significant improvement with placebo accrued each treatment week, with 33% significantly improved at Week 8. Of placebo responders who were improved at both Weeks 4 and 8, 77% remained clinically improved at Week 11 after treatment ended. Independent predictors of significant placebo improvement in the final multivariable model were African American race (odds ratio [OR] = 5.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.41-13.07, p < .001), current smokers (OR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.05-5.06, p = .038), and hot flash severity in screening (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.00-2.10, p = .047).
Conclusions:
Clinically significant improvement with placebo accrued throughout treatment with a time course similar to improvement with active drug. A meaningful number of participants in the placebo group sustained a clinically significant response after stopping placebo pills. The results suggest that nonspecific effects are important components of treatment and warrant further studies to optimize their contributions in clinical care.
More Related Videos
08:50How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants
Published on: December 14, 2014
07:20Author Spotlight: Integrating Traditional Chinese Medicine with Modern Pharmacology and Genomics for Assessing Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in Mice
Published on: August 23, 2024
Related Concept Videos
The Placebo Effect
Blind Procedures
Menopause
Blinding