Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Measuring Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System ANS Activity in Toddlers - Resting and Developmental Challenges
Published on: February 25, 2016
Comparison of formulas for calculation of the corrected QT interval in infants and young children
Derek Q Phan1, Michael J Silka2, Yueh-Tze Lan3
1Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, CA.
Insights
The Bazett formula provides the most consistent rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval calculation in infants and children. A threshold of 460 ms is recommended for identifying prolonged QTc in this population.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Electrocardiography
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Accurate assessment of the rate-corrected QT (QTc) interval is crucial for pediatric cardiac health.
- Several formulas exist for QTc calculation, but their consistency in infants and young children varies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy and consistency of four common QTc correction formulas (Bazett, Fridericia, Hodges, Framingham) in pediatric populations.
- To determine the optimal QTc interval threshold for identifying prolonged QTc in infants and young children.
Main Methods:
- Digital electrocardiograms from 702 children were analyzed.
- QT and R-R intervals were measured to calculate QTc using Bazett, Fridericia, Hodges, and Framingham formulas.
- QTc versus R-R regression line slopes were compared to assess formula consistency.
Main Results:
- The Bazett formula demonstrated the most consistent QTc correction across heart rates (slope -0.019).
- The Fridericia, Hodges, and Framingham formulas showed less consistent corrections.
- A QTc threshold of 460 ms with the Bazett formula was identified as 2 standard deviations above the mean.
Conclusions:
- The Bazett formula is the most reliable for QTc calculation in infants and children.
- A QTc threshold of 460 ms is recommended for prolonged QTc in this age group.
- Findings support the continued use of Bazett formula, contrasting with Fridericia's use in some clinical trials.
Objective:
To compare 4 heart rate correction formulas for calculation of the rate corrected QT (QTc) interval among infants and young children.
Study Design:
R-R and QT intervals were measured from digital electrocardiograms. QTc were calculated with the Bazett, Fridericia, Hodges, and Framingham formulas. QTc vs R-R graphs were plotted, and slopes of the regression lines compared. Slopes of QTc-R-R regression lines close to zero indicate consistent QT corrections over the range of heart rates.
Results:
We reviewed electrocardiograms from 702 children, with 233 (33%) <1 year of age and 567 (81%) <2 years. The average heart rate was 122 ± 20 bpm (median 121 bpm). The slopes of the QTc-R-R regression lines for the 4 correction formulas were -0.019 (Bazett); 0.1028 (Fridericia); -0.1241 (Hodges); and 0.2748 (Framingham). With the Bazett formula, a QTc >460 ms was 2 SDs above the mean, compared with "prolonged" QTc values of 414, 443, and 353 ms for the Fridericia, Hodges, and Framingham formulas, respectively.
Conclusions:
The Bazett formula calculated the most consistent QTc; 460 ms is the best threshold for prolonged QTc. The study supports continued use of the Bazett formula for infants and children and differs from the use of the Fridericia correction during clinical trials of new medications.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Quartile
1; 1; 2; 2; 4; 6; 6.8; 7.2; 8; 8.3; 9; 10; 10; 11.5
The median or second quartile is seven. The lower half of the...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Dosage Interval and Administration Route: Determination Methods

