Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.4K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.4K
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.7K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.7K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.7K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.7K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

6.9K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
6.9K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

13.2K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
13.2K
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

10.6K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
10.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning from students: An inquiry into Charles Spearman's research agenda.

History of psychology·2026
Same author

Roger Kirk (1930-2023).

The American psychologist·2024
Same author

Online cognitive assessment in the era of COVID-19: Examining the validity of the MEZURE.

Psychological assessment·2023
Same author

Evaluation of the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Fourth Edition as a Measurement Instrument.

Journal of Intelligence·2022
Same author

A Misuse of IQ Scores: Using the Dual Discrepancy/Consistency Model for Identifying Specific Learning Disabilities.

Journal of Intelligence·2019
Same author

Revisiting Carroll's survey of factor-analytic studies: Implications for the clinical assessment of intelligence.

Psychological assessment·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Comparing Test Scores Using Information From Criterion-Related Validity Studies.

A Alexander Beaujean1, Sean M McGlaughlin2

  • 1a Department of Educational Psychology , Baylor University , Waco , Texas.

Applied Neuropsychology. Child
|February 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparing test scores from different instruments requires careful consideration. A new method using criterion-related validity studies offers more accurate score comparisons than direct comparison, benefiting clinicians.

Keywords:
psychological assessmentscore comparisonscore exchangeabilitytest scores

More Related Videos

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K
A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing
15:00

A Tablet-Based Curriculum-Based Measurement Protocol for Kindergarten Writing

Published on: February 7, 2025

1.2K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Educational Measurement

Background:

  • Clinicians often need to compare client test scores from various instruments.
  • Directly comparing scores from instruments using the same scale can be misleading.
  • This can lead to misinterpretations of score differences, overestimating or underestimating their significance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a psychometrically sound method for comparing test scores from different instruments.
  • To demonstrate the advantages of this method over direct score comparison.
  • To provide practical tools for clinicians to implement the proposed method.

Main Methods:

  • The study outlines a novel score comparison method utilizing criterion-related validity.
  • Three illustrative examples are provided to demonstrate the application and benefits of the method.
  • Implementation guidance for Microsoft Excel and the R program is included in an appendix.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method is more psychometrically sound than direct score comparison.
  • It yields more accurate comparative scores, reducing misinterpretation.
  • The method requires minimal additional effort for clinicians.

Conclusions:

  • A criterion-related validity-based approach offers a superior method for comparing test scores across different instruments.
  • This method enhances the accuracy of score interpretation in clinical and educational settings.
  • Accessible implementation guides facilitate the adoption of this improved practice.