Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Isolation and Characterization of the Natural Microbiota of the Model Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Published on: August 17, 2022
False-positive results after environmental pinworm PCR testing due to Rhabditid nematodes in Corncob bedding
Mathias Leblanc1, Kristina Berry1, Sandy Graciano1
1Animal Resources Department, The Salk Institute, for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.
Abstract:
Modern rodent colonies are housed in individually ventilated cages to protect the animals from contamination with adventitious pathogens. Standard health monitoring through soiled-bedding sentinels does not always detect infections, especially in the context of low pathogen prevalence. Recently proposed alternatives include analyzing environmental samples from the cages or rack exhaust by PCR to improve the detection of rodent pathogens but optimal sampling strategies have not yet been established for different microorganisms. Although generally very sensitive and specific, these molecular assays are not foolproof and subject to false-positive and -negative results and should always be interpreted cautiously with an overall understanding of the intrinsic controls and all the variables that may affect the results. Here, we report a limited Aspiculuris tetraptera outbreak in a mouse barrier facility that was detected by fecal PCR in sentinels and confirmed by fecal flotation and direct cecal examination of both sentinels and colony animals. The outbreak led to a widespread survey of all facilities for pinworms by using environmental PCR from ventilated rack exhaust plenums. Environmental PCR suggested an unexpected widespread contamination of all ventilated racks holding nonautoclaved cages, but results could not be confirmed in sentinel or colony animals by fecal flotation, cecal and colonic examination, or cage PCR testing. After additional investigation, the unexpected environmental PCR results were confirmed as false-positive findings due to the nonspecificity of the assay, leading to the amplification of rhabditid nematodes, which are not infectious in rodents but which contaminated the corncob bedding.
Insights
Environmental PCR for rodent pathogen detection can yield false positives. A study found nonspecific amplification from bedding contaminants, highlighting the need for careful assay interpretation and validation in animal facilities.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Microbiology
- Laboratory Animal Science
- Molecular Diagnostics
Background:
- Modern rodent facilities use individually ventilated cages to prevent pathogen contamination.
- Standard health monitoring may fail to detect low-prevalence infections.
- Environmental PCR is a proposed alternative for improved pathogen detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate an outbreak of Aspiculuris tetraptera in a mouse facility.
- To evaluate the utility of environmental PCR for detecting pinworms in ventilated rack systems.
- To assess the reliability of environmental PCR assays in detecting rodent pathogens.
Main Methods:
- Initial detection of Aspiculuris tetraptera via fecal PCR in sentinels.
- Confirmation using fecal flotation and direct cecal examination.
- Widespread environmental PCR survey of ventilated rack exhaust plenums.
- Investigation of false-positive environmental PCR results.
Main Results:
- An Aspiculuris tetraptera outbreak was detected and confirmed in sentinel and colony mice.
- Environmental PCR suggested widespread pinworm contamination in ventilated racks with non-autoclaved cages.
- Environmental PCR results could not be corroborated by direct animal or cage testing.
- False-positive environmental PCR results were attributed to nonspecific amplification of non-infectious rhabditid nematodes from bedding.
Conclusions:
- Environmental PCR, while sensitive, can produce false-positive results due to assay nonspecificity.
- Contamination of bedding materials can interfere with environmental PCR-based pathogen detection.
- Careful interpretation of molecular assay results, considering potential contaminants and assay limitations, is crucial for accurate rodent health monitoring.

