Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

1.2K
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
1.2K
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

1.5K
The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the...
1.5K
Perception of Sound Waves01:01

Perception of Sound Waves

6.1K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
6.1K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

1.4K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Teamwork Is Not Just Dreamwork: An Intentional, Evidence-Based Approach to Building and Maintaining an Effective Team.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2025
Same author

Rationale for the Development of a Universal Hearing Metric for Public Consumption: Initiative 1 of the Hearing Health Collaborative.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2025
Same author

The Tinnitus Management Clinic: The Cleveland Clinic Model.

Seminars in hearing·2025
Same author

The association between electrode impedance and short-term outcomes in cochlear implant recipients of slim modiolar and slim straight electrode arrays.

Cochlear implants international·2023
Same author

Teledelivery of Aural Rehabilitation to Improve Cochlear Implant Outcomes.

The Laryngoscope·2023
Same author

The Effect of Aging on Auditory Nerve Function: Insights from Intraoperative eCAP Recordings in Cochlear Implant Users.

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

955

A Speech Perception Test in Simulated Reverberation Conditions.

Jaclyn B Spitzer, Sharon A Sandridge, Craig W Newman

    American Journal of Audiology
    |February 6, 2015
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    New speech test materials (SPIN-Reverb) were created with varying reverberation. Listening performance decreased as reverberation increased for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant (CI) recipients.

    More Related Videos

    A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
    07:14

    A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

    Published on: October 29, 2018

    7.0K
    An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
    07:56

    An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

    Published on: March 13, 2026

    150

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

    Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
    06:04

    Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

    Published on: March 24, 2023

    955
    A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
    07:14

    A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

    Published on: October 29, 2018

    7.0K
    An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
    07:56

    An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

    Published on: March 13, 2026

    150

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Speech Science
    • Acoustics

    Background:

    • Assessing speech perception in noisy environments is crucial for hearing device users.
    • Simulating real-world acoustic challenges, like reverberation, is essential for accurate evaluations.
    • Existing speech tests may not fully capture the impact of reverberation on speech intelligibility.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To develop and validate new speech test materials (SPIN-Reverb) by applying reverberation treatments to sentences with varying contextual redundancy.
    • To investigate the impact of different reverberation times (RT60) on speech perception for normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant (CI) recipients.

    Main Methods:

    • Speech Perception in Noise-Revised (SPIN-R) sentences were modified to create SPIN-Reverb materials with four reverberation conditions (unprocessed, 600 ms, 1200 ms, 3600 ms RT60).
    • Phase 1: List equivalency was established using nonparametric bootstrapping with 75 normal-hearing listeners.
    • Phase 2: The utility of SPIN-Reverb was examined with 15 CI recipients.

    Main Results:

    • Equivalent lists were identified across all reverberation conditions.
    • Speech perception performance significantly decreased with increasing reverberation time (RT60) for both high and low predictability sentences.
    • All tested reverberation conditions (unprocessed, RevCond 1, 2, 3) were significantly different from each other.
    • High- and low-predictability sentences showed significant differences within each reverberation condition.

    Conclusions:

    • The SPIN-Reverb materials, particularly RevCond 1 (600 ms) and RevCond 2 (1200 ms), show promise as supplementary tools for cochlear implant (CI) assessment.
    • SPIN-Reverb offers a set of clinically feasible, graded difficulty materials that realistically simulate acoustic challenges for evaluating sensory devices.