Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:

Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care

Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) is characterized by narrowed arteries that diminish blood flow to the extremities. Effective management of PAD requires an interprofessional approach involving various healthcare professionals. The critical aspects of interprofessional care for PAD patients focus on risk factor modification, drug therapy, exercise therapy, nutrition therapy, critical limb ischemia care, and interventional radiology and surgical procedures.The primary treatment goal for PAD...

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation

A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:

Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I

Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I

An interdisciplinary team includes many healthcare professionals working together and utilizing their skills, knowledge, and expertise to provide holistic and quality patient care.
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...

Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care

Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires collaborative and comprehensive management. CKD progresses through stages and can lead to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) if untreated. Interprofessional collaboration and patient education are crucial, enabling patients to manage their health and improve their quality of life.Diagnostic approach for chronic kidney diseaseThe diagnosis of CKD primarily focuses on the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which assesses kidney function by measuring how well...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Contextualising ventilation decisions: an ethnographic study of factors shaping interprofessional decision-making.

BMC nursing·2026

Same author

Palliative care and assisted dying: An Australian experience that these can become accustomed bedfellows.

Palliative medicine·2025

Same author

Correction to: Peer observation of teaching: multiple-site case study guided by diffusion of innovations theory.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2025

Same author

Implementation, Operationalization, and Optimization of Clinical Competency Committees in Postgraduate Training Programs: A Scoping Review.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2025

Same author

Technical devices and interprofessional clinical decision-making in the intensive care unit: a scoping review.

Journal of interprofessional care·2025

Same author

Peer observation of teaching: multiple-site case study guided by diffusion of innovations theory.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Interprofessional Education and Practice Guide No. 3: Evaluating interprofessional education.

Scott Reeves¹, Sylvain Boet, Brenda Zierler

¹Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Kingston University & St George's University of London , London , UK .

Journal of Interprofessional Care

|February 12, 2015

Summary

This guide offers practical advice for robust interprofessional education (IPE) evaluations. It addresses methodological, practical, and ethical issues to improve the quality of IPE research and evidence.

Keywords:

Evaluation interprofessional education interprofessional learning mixed methods qualitative methods quantitative methods

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 17, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

Area of Science:

Health Professions Education
Evaluation Science

Background:

Increasing publications on interprofessional education (IPE) evaluation exist.
Systematic reviews indicate ongoing empirical weaknesses in IPE evaluation studies.
A need exists to enhance the quality of IPE evaluation research.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide a guide for conducting robust evaluations of interprofessional education (IPE) events.
To offer practical suggestions for improving the quality of IPE evaluation studies.
To address methodological, practical, and ethical considerations in IPE evaluation.

Main Methods:

Presents key lessons and suggestions for undertaking high-quality IPE evaluations.
Covers formation of evaluation questions, use of models, and theoretical perspectives.
Advises on selecting qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods designs, resource management, and dissemination.

Main Results:

Offers a framework for developing strong evaluation questions.
Provides guidance on selecting appropriate evaluation designs and methodologies.
Suggests strategies for effective resource management and dissemination of findings.

Conclusions:

This guide aims to assist health professionals in conducting high-quality IPE evaluations.
Improved evaluation practices will provide valuable evidence for stakeholders.
Enhanced evaluation will contribute to the scholarly knowledge base in the interprofessional field.