Relationship of ocular microcirculation, measured by laser speckle flowgraphy, and silent brain infarction in primary

Hiroshi Kunikata1, Naoko Aizawa2, Masataka Kudo3

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Department of Retinal Disease Control, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Plos One
|February 13, 2015
PubMed

Insights

Primary aldosteronism patients with silent brain infarction were older and had lower blowout time (BOT). Age is a risk factor, while BOT is protective, suggesting BOT can predict silent brain infarction in primary aldosteronism.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Neurology
  • Ophthalmology

Background:

  • Primary aldosteronism (PA) patients face higher cerebro- and cardiovascular event (CVE) risks than essential hypertension (EH) patients.
  • Silent brain infarction (SBI) is a known risk factor and predictor for CVEs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) findings and the occurrence of SBI in PA patients.
  • To evaluate mean blur rate (MBR) as a biomarker for ocular blood flow in relation to SBI.

Main Methods:

  • 87 PA patients without prior symptomatic cerebral events were studied.
  • Mean blur rate (MBR) in the optic nerve head (ONH) was measured using LSFG.
  • SBI occurrence was assessed via magnetic resonance imaging, analyzing MBR waveform variables (skew, blowout score, blowout time) and clinical data.

Main Results:

  • 17% of PA patients had SBI.
  • SBI patients were significantly older and had significantly lower blowout time (BOT) in the ONH capillary area.
  • Age and BOT were identified as independent factors for SBI presence in PA patients.

Conclusions:

  • PA patients with SBI exhibit older age and reduced MBR BOT compared to those without SBI.
  • Age emerged as a risk factor, while BOT acted as a protective factor for SBI in PA.
  • BOT, an objective, non-invasive biomarker, shows potential for predicting SBI in PA evaluations.
Abstract