Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 17, 2026

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
Published on: February 11, 2014
FLORA™: Phase I development of a functional vision assessment for prosthetic vision users
Duane R Geruschat1, Marshall Flax2, Nilima Tanna3
1Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. dgeruschat@jhmi.edu.
A new pilot assessment, the Functional Low-Vision Observer Rated Assessment (FLORA), effectively captures functional vision and well-being in ultra-low vision patients. This tool helps evaluate vision restoration treatments without experiencing floor or ceiling effects.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Rehabilitation Science
Background:
- Developing effective functional assessments is crucial for evaluating vision restoration treatments in ultra-low vision populations.
- The Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System offers partial vision restoration, necessitating tools to measure its impact.
- Existing assessments may not be suitable for individuals with severe to profound vision loss.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and pilot a functional assessment for ultra-low vision individuals undergoing vision restoration.
- To capture functional visual ability and well-being in subjects implanted with the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System.
- To determine the appropriateness of assessment tools and identify potential floor or ceiling effects.
Main Methods:
- The Functional Low-Vision Observer Rated Assessment (FLORA) was developed, incorporating self-report, observed functional tasks, and narrative summaries.
- Twenty-six subjects with severe to profound retinitis pigmentosa, implanted with the Argus II System, were assessed by seven evaluators.
- Analysis focused on the suitability of interview questions and tasks, and the presence of rating scale limitations.
Main Results:
- All 14 interview questions were utilized, and all 35 functional vision tasks were selected for evaluation at least once.
- Evaluators used all four rating options (impossible, difficult, moderate, easy), indicating a lack of floor or ceiling effects.
- Subjects utilized 'vision only' 75% of the time with the Argus II System ON, compared to 29% with the System OFF.
Conclusions:
- The initial version of the FLORA assessment demonstrated utility and avoided floor and ceiling effects in an ultra-low vision population.
- The assessment successfully captured functional vision and well-being in subjects using the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System.
- Future development will focus on refining the FLORA and establishing its reliability and validity for enhanced clinical use.
More Related Videos
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
06:25Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
Published on: February 23, 2024