Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

610
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
610
Cancer Therapies02:49

Cancer Therapies

9.7K
Cancer therapies are various modes of treatment, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy that are administered to cancer patients.
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
9.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LLM-Driven Extraction of NI-RADS and Imaging Tumor Characteristics to Enhance Oropharyngeal Cancer Survivorship Surveillance.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Automated identification of bolus types in modified barium swallow studies using deep learning: a preliminary study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Pharyngeal Dysphagia in Cancer: Characterizing Functional and Physiological Swallow Targets Across 12 Cancer Types.

Dysphagia·2026
Same author

A Standardized Algorithm's Impact on Primary Detection in Head and Neck Carcinoma of Unknown Primary.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2026
Same author

A cross-sectional protocol for experimental tongue high-density surface electromyography to detect and classify radiation-associated hypoglossal neuropathy.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Neck adiposity on standard oncologic CT predicts radiation-induced carotid disease in oropharyngeal cancer.

Cardio-oncology (London, England)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
07:29

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment

Published on: April 22, 2019

12.1K

Comparative effectiveness in head and neck malignancies.

Carol M Lewis1, Katherine A Hutcheson, Michael E Kupferman

  • 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US, CMLewis@mdanderson.org.

Cancer Treatment and Research
|February 14, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) in head and neck surgical oncology is limited due to patient accrual and bias issues. Careful study design can overcome these challenges to improve cancer care.

More Related Videos

Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
06:11

Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Published on: April 20, 2018

10.2K
Multi-photon Imaging of Tumor Cell Invasion in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
12:03

Multi-photon Imaging of Tumor Cell Invasion in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Published on: July 25, 2011

19.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
07:29

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment

Published on: April 22, 2019

12.1K
Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
06:11

Therapy Testing in a Spheroid-based 3D Cell Culture Model for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Published on: April 20, 2018

10.2K
Multi-photon Imaging of Tumor Cell Invasion in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
12:03

Multi-photon Imaging of Tumor Cell Invasion in an Orthotopic Mouse Model of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Published on: July 25, 2011

19.9K

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research

Background:

  • Limited comparative effectiveness research (CER) exists in head and neck surgical oncology.
  • Barriers include low patient accrual, selection bias in observational studies, and challenges integrating clinical and functional outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Identify areas needing meaningful CER in head and neck cancer care.
  • Evaluate quality metrics and patient-reported outcomes.
  • Address gaps in current head and neck cancer treatment and surveillance.

Main Methods:

  • Discusses the challenges in designing and conducting CER for head and neck cancers.
  • Highlights the need for robust study designs.
  • Emphasizes the role of statistical analyses in addressing research gaps.

Main Results:

  • Significant barriers hinder CER in head and neck surgical oncology.
  • Areas for CER include initial evaluation, post-treatment surveillance, quality metrics, and patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Despite existing hurdles, well-designed studies and appropriate statistical methods can advance CER in head and neck cancer.
  • Improving CER is crucial for optimizing patient care and outcomes in this field.